...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of tuina for cervical spondylosis.
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of tuina for cervical spondylosis.

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析推拿对颈椎病的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study performed a meta-analysis of seven parallel-group comparison studies evaluating the efficacy of tuina in treating cervical spondylosis. BACKGROUND: Tuina is a form of Chinese manipulative therapy. It has been used as a modality for the treatment of symptoms associated with such a musculoskeletal condition as cervical spondylosis. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of tuina for cervical spondylosis has yet to be determined. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Cochrane library, Pubmed, MEDLINE, EBM review, ProQuest Medical Bundle and SCOPUS databases were searched using the following medical subject headings or key words: tuina, tuinaology, manual medicine, massotherapy, cervical spondylopathy, cervical spondylosis and cervical vertebrae. Chinese research papers were searched through the Chinese electronic periodical services and Wangfane database. The publication date was limited from 1996-2007. Studies were selected if they were written in English or Chinese, used tuina as a stand-alone modality, used a parallel-group comparison design and explicated raw data regarding symptoms relief. Two independent reviewers reviewed the selected studies based on the evidence rating system of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Studies with an evidence rating of II-2 fair or above were included in this review. RESULTS: The direction of the effect size for the improvement of blood flow velocity of vertebral artery and basilar artery was not consistent across studies. Moreover, the pooled effect size was negligible. No evidence supported that tuina could improve headache and vertigo. A small effect of tuina on the viscosity of blood and plasma was found. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this systematic review, a definitive conclusion regarding the effects of tuina on cervical spondylosis remains to be determined. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The efficacy of tuina is not supported by parallel-group comparison studies.
机译:目的和目的:本研究对7项平行组比较研究进行了荟萃分析,评估了推拿治疗颈椎病的疗效。背景:推拿是一种中国式的手法疗法。它已被用作治疗与诸如颈椎病等肌肉骨骼疾病有关的症状的方法。但是,关于推拿对颈椎病疗效的证据尚未确定。设计:系统评价。方法:使用以下医学主题词或关键词搜索Cochrane库,Pubmed,MEDLINE,EBM评论,ProQuest Medical Bundle和SCOPUS数据库:推拿,推拿学,手动医学,按摩疗法,颈椎病,颈椎病和颈椎病。通过中文电子期刊服务和Wangfane数据库搜索中文研究论文。出版日期限制为1996年至2007年。如果研究以英文或中文编写,以推拿作为独立形式,采用平行组比较设计并提供有关缓解症状的原始数据,则选择研究。两名独立的审阅者根据美国预防服务工作队的证据评级系统对选定的研究进行了审查。本评价包括证据等级为II-2或以上的研究。结果:在整个研究中,改善椎动脉和基底动脉血流速度的效应大小的方向不一致。此外,合并效应的大小可以忽略不计。没有证据支持推拿可以改善头痛和眩晕。发现推拿对血液和血浆的粘度有很小的影响。结论:基于系统评价的结果,关于推拿对颈椎病影响的明确结论尚待确定。与临床实践的关系:平行组比较研究不支持推拿的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号