首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >The strength of different fixation techniques for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures--a biomechanical study.
【24h】

The strength of different fixation techniques for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures--a biomechanical study.

机译:双con胫骨平台骨折不同固定方法的强度-生物力学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. To compare the mechanical strength of fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures using internal and external fixation techniques.Design. A randomised laboratory testing of fixation methods currently in clinical use.Background. To reduce the high complication rate associated with the double plating, many surgeons have started to use less invasive techniques. However the literature comparing the mechanical performance of these methods is still scarce.Methods. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures were simulated on Sawbones tibiae and fixed with one of the five fixation methods: dual plating, a two-ring hybrid fixator with inter-fragmentary screws, a ring-bar hybrid fixator with inter-fragmentary screws, lateral plate and medial monolateral external fixator, lateral plate and medial inter-fragmentary screws. Following statistical power calculations, seven tibiae were used for each fixation method. The specimens were tested in cyclical compression to failure. The vertical subsidence in the medial or lateral plateau was measured using extensometers.Results. In all cases the mode of failure was consistent with collapse occurring in the medial plateau. There was no significant difference in the failure load between dual plating and the two-ring hybrid fixator (4218 N and 4184 N respectively; P=0.28, t-test). Failure was seen at significantly lower loads with the other fixation systems.Conclusion. Weight-bearing mobilisation of the patient may be undertaken earlier with more confidence by using the double plating or two-ring hybrid fixator rather than other less strong techniques. The choice on which of these two methods to use may depend on tissue viability and surgeon preference.
机译:目的。比较使用内部和外部固定技术固定双con胫骨平台骨折的机械强度。设计。目前在临床上使用的固定方法的随机实验室测试。为了降低与双板法相关的高并发症发生率,许多外科医生已开始使用侵入性较小的技术。但是,比较这些方法的机械性能的文献仍然很少。用胫骨锯齿胫骨平台骨折进行模拟,并用以下五种固定方法之一进行固定:双板,带碎片间螺钉的两环混合固定器,带碎片间螺钉的环-杆混合固定器,外侧板和内侧单侧外固定器,外侧板和内侧骨折间螺钉。经过统计功效计算,每种固定方法均使用七个胫骨。在循环压缩至破坏的条件下测试了样品。使用引伸计测量内侧或外侧平台的垂直沉降。在所有情况下,失败的模式都与内侧高原发生的塌陷相一致。双板和双环混合固定器的失效载荷没有显着差异(分别为4218 N和4184 N; P = 0.28,t检验)。在使用其他固定系统的情况下,在较低的负载下会出现故障。通过使用双板或两环混合固定器,而不是其他强度较低的技术,可以更自信地更早地进行患者的负重动员。在这两种方法中使用哪种选择可能取决于组织生存力和外科医生的偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号