首页> 外文期刊>Journal of commercial biotechnology >When is patent infringement not patent infringement? Merck v Integra and the `safe harbour'
【24h】

When is patent infringement not patent infringement? Merck v Integra and the `safe harbour'

机译:什么时候专利侵权不是专利侵权?默克诉Integra与“安全港”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Supreme Court recently ruled on the scope of the patent infringement `safe harbour' of 35 U.S.C. §271(e)(1), which was passed by Congress in 1984 to allow generic drug manufacturers to test their drugs before the expiration of the patents that covered the drugs. The scope of the safe harbour has been interpreted by the courts to be much broader than that, and the Supreme Court confirmed the breadth of the exemption. The Supreme Court did not, however, address the application of the safe harbour to research tools, an issue of vast commercial importance. This paper traces the history of the safe harbour and the Merck v Integra decision, and explains the current state of the law and where the law may be going.
机译:最高法院最近对美国35个州的专利侵权“安全港”的范围作出裁定。第271(e)(1)条,于1984年由国会通过,允许仿制药生产商在涵盖该药物的专利到期之前对其药物进行测试。法院认为,安全港的范围要比这大得多,最高法院确认了豁免的范围。但是,最高法院没有解决将安全港应用于研究工具的问题,这在商业上具有重大意义。本文追溯了安全港的历史和默克诉Integra判决,并解释了法律的当前状态以及法律的发展方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号