...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of community psychology >SENSE OF COMMUNITY AS CONSTRUCT AND THEORY: AUTHORS’ RESPONSE TO MCMILLAN
【24h】

SENSE OF COMMUNITY AS CONSTRUCT AND THEORY: AUTHORS’ RESPONSE TO MCMILLAN

机译:社区作为结构和理论的感觉:作者对MCMILLAN的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, we respond to criticisms posed by McMillan (2011) of our recent paper, “Viewing Community as Responsibility as well as a Resource: Deconstructing the Theoretical Roots of Psychological Sense of Community.” We clarify that the focus of our article was to explore the macro theoretical frameworks and second-order assumptions that have guided the measurement and study of the psychological sense of community (PSOC) construct to date. We then correct McMillan’s mischaracterization of our work as a normative theory by clarifying that our thesis was not that PSOC is a value – but rather that (a) people have values and belief systems, and (b) these belief systems may interact with aspects of a community context to evoke a sense of responsibility for a community to which one belongs. We conclude by reviewing key areas of shared agreement concerning responsibility aspects of PSOC that may serve as a foundation for guiding future research.
机译:在这篇文章中,我们回应了麦克米兰(2011)对我们最近的论文“将社区视为责任和资源的看法:解构社区心理意识的理论根源”的批评。我们澄清说,本文的重点是探索宏观理论框架和二阶假设,这些理论和二阶假设指导了迄今为止对社区心理意识(PSOC)建构的测量和研究。然后,我们通过澄清我们的论点不是PSOC是一种价值,而是纠正(a)人们具有价值和信念系统,以及(b)这些信念系统可能与以下方面相互作用,来纠正McMillan将我们的工作误认为规范理论的错误特征。在社区环境中唤起对所属社区的责任感。最后,我们回顾了有关PSOC责任方面的共享协议的关键领域,这些领域可以作为指导未来研究的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号