...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology >A Comparison of Humiliation Measurement in a Depressive Versus Non-clinical Sample: A Possible Clinical Utility
【24h】

A Comparison of Humiliation Measurement in a Depressive Versus Non-clinical Sample: A Possible Clinical Utility

机译:抑郁与非临床样本中的羞辱测量比较:可能的临床效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We aimed to deepen the clinical utility of humiliation assessment in the study of depression. Method: We performed a correlational analysis of the relationship between humiliation, depression, resilience, and negative primary familial environment in 80 clinically depressed subjects (41 men and 39 women; mean age = 40.71, standard deviation SD = 9.94) and a strictly matched sample of 80 non-clinical subjects (41 men and 39 women; mean age = 40.64, SD = 10.24). We also implemented a hierarchical multiple regression analysis for each sample, to test the prediction of these variables on depression. Results: Humiliation showed positive correlations with depressive factors, while negative correlations emerged with resilience in both samples. The hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed humiliation to be the most predictive factor of depression in the clinical sample only. Conclusion: This study improves the understanding of the relationship of humiliation and depression in both clinical and non-clinical populations. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的:我们旨在加深羞辱评估在抑郁症研究中的临床应用。方法:我们对80名临床抑郁患者(41名男性和39名女性;平均年龄= 40.71,标准差SD = 9.94)和严格匹配的样本进行了屈辱,抑郁,适应力和负性原发性家族环境之间的关系的相关分析。 80位非临床受试者(41位男性和39位女性;平均年龄= 40.64,SD = 10.24)。我们还对每个样本实施了分层多元回归分析,以测试抑郁症对这些变量的预测。结果:两个样本中,羞辱与抑郁因素呈正相关,而与韧性之间呈负相关。分层多元回归分析显示,屈辱仅是临床样本中抑郁的最预测因素。结论:本研究增进了对临床和非临床人群中屈辱与抑郁之间关系的理解。 (C)2015威利期刊公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号