...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients
【24h】

Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients

机译:使用容积钳方法连续无创测量动脉压:重症监护病房患者CNAP装置的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The CNAP system allows continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement based on the volume clamp method using a finger cuff. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between arterial pressure measurements noninvasively obtained using the CNAP device and arterial catheter-derived arterial pressure measurements in intensive care unit patients. In 55 intensive care unit patients, we simultaneously recorded arterial pressure values obtained by an arterial catheter placed in the abdominal aorta through the femoral artery (criterion standard) and arterial pressure values determined noninvasively using CNAP. We performed Bland-Altman analysis and calculated the percentage error. The mean difference (+/- standard deviation, 95 % limits of agreement, percentage error) between noninvasive (CNAP) and invasively assessed arterial pressure was for mean arterial pressure +1 mmHg (+/- 9 mmHg, -16 to +19 mmHg, 22 %), for systolic arterial pressure -10 mmHg (+/- 16 mmHg, -42 to +21 mmHg, 27 %), and for diastolic arterial pressure +7 mmHg (+/- 9 mmHg, -10 to +24 mmHg, 28 %). Our results indicate a reasonable accuracy and precision for the determination of mean and diastolic arterial pressure by noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurements using the volume clamp method compared with the criterion standard (invasive arterial catheter). Systolic arterial pressure is determined less accurately and precisely.
机译:CNAP系统允许使用指套基于容积钳方法连续进行非侵入性动脉压测量。我们旨在评估在重症监护病房患者中使用CNAP设备无创获得的动脉压测量值与源自动脉导管的动脉压测量值之间的一致性。在55名重症监护病房患者中,我们同时记录了通过股动脉通过腹主动脉放置在腹主动脉中的动脉导管获得的动脉压值(标准),以及使用CNAP无创测定的动脉压值。我们进行了Bland-Altman分析并计算了百分比误差。无创(CNAP)与有创评估的动脉压之间的平均差异(+/-标准偏差,95%的一致限,百分误差)是平均动脉压+1 mmHg(+/- 9 mmHg,-16至+19 mmHg ,22%),收缩压为-10 mmHg(+/- 16 mmHg,-42至+21 mmHg,27%),舒张压为+7 mmHg(+/- 9 mmHg,-10至+24 mmHg,28%)。我们的结果表明,与标准标准品(侵入性动脉导管)相比,使用容积钳方法通过无创连续性动脉压测量确定平均和舒张期动脉压的合理准确性和精密度。收缩期动脉压的测定不够准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号