首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laser medicine and surgery >Clinical comparison between conventional suture and vaporization with carbon dioxide laser in rat's skin.
【24h】

Clinical comparison between conventional suture and vaporization with carbon dioxide laser in rat's skin.

机译:常规缝合与二氧化碳激光在大鼠皮肤中蒸发的临床比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study compares wound healing efficiency on a rat's skin when the incision was closed with a conventional suture versus vaporized with a CO2 laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 24 rats were used, and two longitudinal incisions were made with a conventional scalpel in the dorsum of each rat. The left incision was sutured with nylon thread, and the right incision was closed by vaporization with a defocused CO2 laser in continuous mode with an 8-watt power density. Clinical photographs were taken immediately after the procedure, 24 h later, and after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, documenting the healing of the incision. RESULTS: The results showed that there was an initial delay in wound repair in the vaporized incision as compared to the scalpel incision, but after 21 days, both incisions showed the same clinical characteristics. However, the vaporized incision showed no trauma of the tissue, as opposed to the sutured incision, and no hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the CO2 laser can eventually replace the use of sutures.
机译:目的:本研究比较了用常规缝合线缝合切口与用CO2激光蒸发切口时大鼠皮肤的伤口愈合效率。材料与方法:在本研究中,使用了24只大鼠,并用常规解剖刀在每只大鼠的背部进行了两个纵向切口。左切口用尼龙线缝合,右切口通过散焦CO2激光以连续模式以8瓦功率密度蒸发而闭合。手术后,24小时后以及3、7、14和21天后立即拍摄临床照片,记录切口的愈合情况。结果:与手术刀切口相比,气化切口在伤口修复方面存在最初的延迟,但在21天后,两个切口均显示出相同的临床特征。然而,与缝合的切口相反,汽化的切口没有显示出组织的创伤,也没有出血并发症。结论:这些结果表明,CO2激光最终可以代替缝合线的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号