...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Clustering of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Heart Failure Patients Implanted with a Biventricular Cardioverter Defibrillator
【24h】

Clustering of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Heart Failure Patients Implanted with a Biventricular Cardioverter Defibrillator

机译:心力衰竭患者植入双室心脏复律除颤器的室速性心律失常

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Clustering of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in HF Patients. Background: Temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF) have been studied only in patients who have received implantable cardioverter deflbrillators (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden death, and mainly in ischemic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate VT/VF recurrence patterns in heart failure (HF) patients with biventricular ICD and to stratify results according to HF etiology and ICD indication.Methods andResults: We studied 421 patients (91% male, 66 ± 9 years). HF etiology was ischemic in 292 patients and nonischemic in 129. ICD indication was for primary prevention in 227 patients and secondary prevention in 194. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 26 ± 7%, QRS duration 168 ± 32 msec, and NYHA class 2.9 ± 0.6. In a follow-up of 19 ± 11 months, 1,838 VT/VF in 110 patients were appropriately detected. In 59 patients who had >4 episodes, we tried to determine whether VT/VF occurred randomly or rather tended to cluster by fitting the frequency distribution of tachycardia interdetection intervals with exponential functions: VT/VF clusters were observed in 46 patients (78% of the subgroup of patients with >4 episodes and 11% of the overall population). On multivariate logistic analysis, VT/VF clusters were significantly (P < 0.01) associated with ICD indication for secondary prevention (odds ratio [OR] = 3.12; confidence interval [CI] = 1.56-6.92), nonischemic HF etiology (OR = 4.34; CI - 2.02-9.32), monomorphic VT (OR = 4.96; CI = 2.28-10.8), and LVEF < 25% (OR = 3.34; CI = 1.54-7.23). Cardiovascular hospitalizations and deaths occurred more frequently in cluster (21/46 [46%]) than in noncluster patients (63/375 (17%), P < 0.0001).Conclusions: In HF patients with biventricular ICDs, VT/VF clusters may be regarded as the epiphe-nomenon of HF deterioration or as a marker of suboptimal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
机译:HF患者的室速性心律失常聚集。背景:室速性心律失常(VT / VF)的时间模式仅在接受了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的继发性猝死二级预防的患者中进行了研究,主要是在缺血性患者中。这项研究的目的是评估心力衰竭(HF)双心室ICD患者的VT / VF复发模式,并根据HF病因和ICD适应症分层结果。方法和结果:我们研究了421例患者(91%的男性,66±9)年份)。 HF病因是缺血性的,有292例患者,非缺血性,有129例。ICD适应症是227例患者的一级预防,194例是二级预防。基线左室射血分数(LVEF)为26±7%,QRS持续时间168±32毫秒,以及NYHA等级2.9±0.6。在19±11个月的随访中,对110例患者进行了适当的1838 VT / VF检测。在59例> 4次发作的患者中,我们试图通过将心动过速检测间隔的频率分布与指数函数进行拟合来确定VT / VF是否随机发生或趋于聚集:在46例患者中观察到VT / VF聚集(78% > 4次发作且占总人口的11%的患者亚组)。在多因素logistic分析中,VT / VF簇与ICD二级预防的适应症显着相关(P <0.01)(几率[OR] = 3.12;置信区间[CI] = 1.56-6.92),非缺血性HF病因(OR = 4.34) ; CI-2.02-9.32),单态VT(OR = 4.96; CI = 2.28-10.8)和LVEF <25%(OR = 3.34; CI = 1.54-7.23)。与非集群患者(63/375(17%),P <0.0001)相比,集群患者(21/46 [46%])的心血管住院和死亡发生率更高。结论:在双室ICD的HF患者中,VT / VF集群可能被认为是心力衰竭恶化的流行现象或对心脏再同步治疗反应欠佳的标志。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号