...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology >Confirmation of the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Children's Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive in Clinic-Referred Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder
【24h】

Confirmation of the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Children's Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive in Clinic-Referred Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

机译:儿童敌对和攻击量表的因素结构和测量不变性的确认:有自闭症和无自闭症的临床转诊儿童的反应性/积极性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The measurement of aggression in its different forms (e.g., physical and verbal) and functions (e.g., impulsive and instrumental) is given little attention in subjects with developmental disabilities (DD). In this study, we confirm the factor structure of the Children's Scale for Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive (C-SHARP) and demonstrate measurement invariance (consistent performance across clinical groups) between clinic-referred groups with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We also provide evidence of the construct validity of the C-SHARP. Methods: Caregivers provided C-SHARP, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and Proactive/Reactive Rating Scale (PRRS) ratings for 644 children, adolescents, and young adults 2-21 years of age. Five types of measurement invariance were evaluated within a confirmatory factor analytic framework. Associations among the C-SHARP, CBCL, and PRRS were explored. Results: The factor structure of the C-SHARP had a good fit to the data from both groups, and strict measurement invariance between ASD and non-ASD groups was demonstrated (i.e., equivalent structure, factor loadings, item intercepts and residuals, and latent variance/covariance between groups). The C-SHARP Problem Scale was more strongly associated with CBCL Externalizing than with CBCL Internalizing, supporting its construct validity. Subjects classified with the PRRS as both Reactive and Proactive had significantly higher C-SHARP Proactive Scores than those classified as Reactive only, who were rated significantly higher than those classified by the PRRS as Neither Reactive nor Proactive. A similar pattern was observed for the C-SHARP Reactive Score. Conclusions: This study provided evidence of the validity of the C-SHARP through confirmation of its factor structure and its relationship with more established scales. The demonstration of measurement invariance demonstrates that differences in C-SHARP factor scores were the result of differences in the construct rather than to error or unmeasureduisance variables. These data suggest that the C-SHARP is useful for quantifying subtypes of aggressive behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults with DD.
机译:目的:对于发展性障碍(DD)的受试者,以不同形式(例如身体和言语)和功能(例如冲动和工具)的攻击性测量很少受到关注。在这项研究中,我们确认了儿童敌对和攻击量表的因素结构:反应性/主动性(C-SHARP),并证明了在有和没有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的临床推荐组之间的测量不变性(各临床组的表现一致) )。我们还提供了C-SHARP构建有效性的证据。方法:护理人员为644位2-21岁的儿童,青少年和年轻人提供了C-SHARP,儿童行为清单(CBCL)和前瞻性/反应性等级量表(PRRS)等级。在验证性因素分析框架内评估了五种类型的测量不变性。探索了C-SHARP,CBCL和PRRS之间的关联。结果:C-SHARP的因子结构非常适合两组数据,并且证明了ASD和非ASD组之间严格的测量不变性(即等效结构,因子负荷,项目截距和残差以及潜在组之间的方差/协方差)。 C-SHARP问题量表与CBCL内在联系比与CBCL内在联系更紧密,支持其建构效度。与PRRS分类为“无反应型”或“前摄性”的受试者相比,同时被PRRS分类为“反应型”和“前摄性”的受试者的C-SHARP主动评分显着高于仅被分类为“反应型”的受试者。对于C-SHARP反应评分,观察到类似的模式。结论:本研究通过证实其因子结构及其与更既定规模的关系,提供了C-SHARP有效性的证据。测量不变性的证明表明,C-SHARP因子得分的差异是结构差异的结果,而不是误差或未测量/令人讨厌的变量。这些数据表明,C-SHARP可用于量化DD儿童,青少年和年轻成年人的攻击行为的亚型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号