...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform.
【24h】

Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform.

机译:未校准的动脉脉冲轮廓分析与连续热稀释技术:动脉波形变化的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare an arterial pressure-derived cardiac output (APCO) (Vigileo software version 1.07; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and a thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) as methods for measuring cardiac output under different pathologic and experimental conditions that induce changes in arterial waveform morphology. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A university hospital, single institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Simultaneous APCO and CCO were compared in low-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery (without valvular disease) (control, n = 20), patients with aortic stenosis (AS, n = 10), aortic insufficiency (AI, n = 10), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP, n = 12). In the control group, additional data were registered before and after median sternotomy and phenylephrine administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the control group, Bland-Altman showed a bias of -3% (95% limits of agreement: -59% to +53%) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and of -1% (95% limits of agreement: -51% to +50%) after CPB. In the AS group, the bias was -5% (95% limits of agreement: -34% to +24%) before CPB and 1% (95% limits of agreement: -28 to +30%) after CPB. In the AI group bias was +32% (95% limits of agreement: -4% to +68%) before CPB and -2% (95% limits of agreement: -35% to +32%) after CPB. Median sternotomy decreased CCO by 10% +/- 10%, whereas it increased APCO by 56% +/- 28%. Phenylephrine administration decreased CCO by 11% +/- 16%, whereas it increased APCO by 55% +/- 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output measurement based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis is able to reflect cardiac output measured with the continuous thermodilution method in patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery surgery. However, in situations in which the arterial pressure waveform is changed, agreement between techniques may be altered and data obtained with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis may become less reliable.
机译:目的:比较动脉压衍生的心输出量(APCO)(Vigileo软件版本1.07; Edwards Lifesciences,Irvine,CA)和热稀释心输出量(CCO)作为在不同病理和实验条件下引起变化的心输出量的测量方法在动脉波形形态上。设计:一项前瞻性研究。地点:大学医院,单一机构。参加者:52例接受择期心脏手术的患者。干预措施:在接受择期冠状动脉手术(无瓣膜疾病)的低风险患者(对照组,n = 20),主动脉瓣狭窄(AS,n = 10),主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI,n = 10)和主动脉内气囊泵(IABP,n = 12)。在对照组中,在中位胸骨切开术和去氧肾上腺素给药前后都记录了其他数据。测量和主要结果:在对照组中,Bland-Altman在体外循环(CPB)前显示为-3%(一致性的95%同意:-59%至+ 53%)和-1%(95%的极限)达成协议后:CPB之后的-51%至+ 50%)。在AS组中,CPB之前的偏差为-5%(协议限制的95%:-34%至+24%),CPB之后的偏差为1%(协议的95%限制:-28至+ 30%)。在AI组中,CPB前的偏倚为+ 32%(协议限制的95%:-4%至+68%),CPB之后的偏倚为-2%(协议的限制95%:-35%至+ 32%)。中位胸骨切开术可使CCO降低10%+/- 10%,而使APCO升高56%+/- 28%。服用去氧肾上腺素可使CCO降低11%+/- 16%,而使APCO升高55%+/- 34%。结论:基于未经校准的脉搏轮廓分析的心输出量测量能够反映使用连续热稀释法对接受简单冠状动脉手术的患者的心输出量。但是,在动脉压波形发生变化的情况下,技术之间的一致性可能会发生变化,并且使用未经校准的脉冲轮廓分析获得的数据可能会变得不那么可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号