首页>
外文期刊>Journal of adolescence
>Are youths' feelings of entitlement always 'bad'?: Evidence for a distinction between exploitive and non-exploitive dimensions of entitlement.
【24h】
Are youths' feelings of entitlement always 'bad'?: Evidence for a distinction between exploitive and non-exploitive dimensions of entitlement.
Previous personality research (e.g., Campbell et al., 2004) has described the sense of entitlement as an unifactorial construct. In this study, we examined characteristics of two potential facets of entitlement: exploitive entitlement, characterized by exploitive interactions and expectations of special treatment, and non-exploitive entitlement, or entitled beliefs that rest on notions of self-worth and fairness. 466 college students (mean age = 20.5) completed a questionnaire consisting of unifactorial and two-factor measures of entitlement and other personality dispositions and attitudes. As expected, both exploitive and non-exploitive entitlement were positively related to the Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES; r = .51 and r = .43, respectively), an unifactorial measure of entitlement. In other respects, exploitive and non-exploitive entitlement had quite distinct correlates. Exploitive entitlement was uniquely related to higher levels of psychopathy and neuroticism, and lower levels of work orientation, social commitment, and self-esteem; whereas non-exploitive entitlement was uniquely associated with higher self-esteem.
展开▼
机译:先前的人格研究(例如Campbell等,2004)将权利感描述为一种单因素构造。在这项研究中,我们研究了权利的两个潜在方面的特征:剥削性权利,其特征在于剥削性相互作用和对特殊待遇的期望,以及非剥削性权利,或基于自我价值和公平概念的有权信仰。 466名大学生(平均年龄= 20.5)完成了一份调查问卷,该调查问卷包含对权利以及其他人格倾向和态度的单因素和两因素测量。正如预期的那样,剥削权利和非剥削权利都与心理权利量表(PES; r = .51和r = .43)呈正相关,这是对权利的单因素衡量。在其他方面,剥削性权利和非剥削性权利具有明显不同的关联。剥削权利与更高水平的精神病和神经质以及较低水平的工作取向,社会承诺和自尊有关;非剥夺性权利与更高的自尊心唯一相关。
展开▼