首页> 外文期刊>Journal of addictive diseases: the official journal of the ASAM, American Society of Addiction Medicine >Substance Abuse-Specific Knowledge Transfer or Loss? Treatment Program Turnover versus Professional Turnover Among Substance Abuse Clinicians
【24h】

Substance Abuse-Specific Knowledge Transfer or Loss? Treatment Program Turnover versus Professional Turnover Among Substance Abuse Clinicians

机译:特定于物质滥用的知识转移还是损失?药物滥用临床医生的治疗计划更替与专业更替

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This longitudinal study investigated the extent to which substance abuse (SA) clinician turnover is associated with SA-specific knowledge loss due to change in professions (professional turnover) versus SA-specific knowledge transfer due to movement from one SA clinical setting to another (treatment program turnover). For this study, clinicians had to have voluntarily left their current treatment program. Eligible clinicians completed a quantitative survey while employed and a qualitative post-employment exit interview 1 year later. Compared to those that exited the SA profession (n = 99), clinicians who changed treatment programs (n = 120) had greater SA-specific formal knowledge and were more likely to be personally in recovery. No differences were found between the two groups in terms of SA-specific practical knowledge.
机译:这项纵向研究调查了药物滥用(SA)临床医生离职与因专业变化(专业离职)而导致的SA特定知识流失与因从一种SA临床环境转移到另一SA临床环境而导致的SA特定知识转移相关的程度计划营业额)。对于这项研究,临床医生必须自愿退出其当前的治疗计划。合格的临床医生在工作期间完成了定量调查,并于一年后完成了定性的离职后离职面试。与退出SA专业的患者(n = 99)相比,更改治疗方案的临床医生(n = 120)具有更多的SA特定形式知识,并且更有可能亲自康复。在SA特定的实践知识方面,两组之间没有发现差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号