...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Critical review of burn depth assessment techniques: Part I. Historical review.
【24h】

Critical review of burn depth assessment techniques: Part I. Historical review.

机译:烧伤深度评估技术的严格审查:第一部分。历史审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The assessment of burn depth, and as such, the estimation of whether a burn wound is expected to heal on its own within 21 days, is one of the most important roles of the burn surgeon. A false-positive assessment and the patient faces needless surgery, a false-negative one and the patient faces increased length of stay, risks contracture, and hypertrophic scar formation. Although many clinical signs can aid in this determination, accurate assessment of burn depth is possible only 64 to 76% of the time, even for experienced burn surgeons. Through the years, a variety of tools have become available, all attempting to improve clinical accuracy. Part 1 of this two-part article reviews the literature supporting the different adjuvants to clinical decision making is, providing a historical perspective that serves as a framework for part 2, a critical assessment of laser Doppler imaging.
机译:烧伤深度的评估,以及烧伤创面是否有望在21天内自行愈合的评估,是烧伤外科医师最重要的角色之一。如果评估为假阳性,则患者将接受不必要的手术;如果评估为假阴性,则患者将面临更长的住院时间,挛缩和肥厚性瘢痕形成。尽管许多临床体征可以帮助确定,但是即使对于有经验的烧伤外科医生,也只能在64%至76%的时间内准确评估烧伤深度。多年来,已经出现了各种工具,所有这些工具都试图提高临床准确性。这个由两部分组成的文章的第1部分回顾了支持临床决策不同佐剂的文献,提供了作为第2部分框架的历史观点,第2部分是激光多普勒成像的关键评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号