首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Triage accuracy at a multiple casualty incident disaster drill: the Emergency Medical Service, Fire Department of New York City experience.
【24h】

Triage accuracy at a multiple casualty incident disaster drill: the Emergency Medical Service, Fire Department of New York City experience.

机译:多伤亡事件灾难演习中的分诊准确性:纽约市消防部门的紧急医疗服务经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We sought to evaluate the accuracy and speed for the triage of multiple patients during a disaster drill by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel. During a disaster drill (train collision with blast injury and chemical release), the accuracy and speed of triage of 130 patient-actors by the Fire Department of New York City (FDNY) EMS personnel was evaluated using the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage system. All EMS personnel had been previously trained in START, but refresher training was not administered before the drill. Overall triage accuracy was 78%. In patients that had additional changes in their status during the triage process (injects), 62% were retriaged appropriately. Because of security and decontamination procedures, triage at the triage/treatment area began 40 minutes after the drill commenced. It took 2 hours and 38 minutes to completely clear the scene of all patients. On average, the time from the start of triage to transport was 1 hour and 2 minutes. Despite the fact that triage is a skill practiced by every EMS system in the country on a daily basis, few studies regarding triage accuracy are available. Limited data suggest that the triage accuracy rates using different triage strategy algorithms are approximately 45% to 55%. During this drill, FDNY-EMS triage accuracy using the START system exceeded these expectations. This study provides insight as to the triage experience of a large urban EMS system operating at a disaster drill.
机译:我们试图评估紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员在一次灾难演习中对多名患者进行分诊的准确性和速度。在灾难演习中(火车相撞,爆炸伤害和化学物质释放),纽约市消防局(FDNY)EMS人员对130位患者行为者进行分类的准确性和速度使用了简单分类和快速处理程序(START )分类系统。之前,所有EMS人员都已经接受过START培训,但在演习之前未进行进修培训。总体分类准确性为78%。在分诊过程中状态发生其他变化(注射)的患者中,有62%进行了适当的重试。由于安全性和净化程序的要求,在演习开始后40分钟开始在分类/处理区域进行分类。完全清除所有患者的现场花费了2小时38分钟。从开始分类到运输的平均时间为1小时2分钟。尽管分诊是该国每个EMS系统每天都练习的一项技能,但很少有关于分诊准确性的研究。有限的数据表明,使用不同分类策略算法的分类准确率大约为45%至55%。在这次演习中,使用START系统的FDNY-EMS分流精度超出了这些预期。这项研究提供了有关在灾难演习中运行的大型城市EMS系统的分类经验的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号