首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials. >Overestimating hybrid layer quality in polished adhesive/dentin interfaces
【24h】

Overestimating hybrid layer quality in polished adhesive/dentin interfaces

机译:高估抛光的粘合剂/牙本质界面中的混合层质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The most popular techniques for determining the quality of the hybrid layer (HL) have relied on morphologic characterization of the polished adhesive/dentin (a/d) interfaces before and after acid-bleach chemical treatment. Using these techniques, the existence of smooth, acid-resistant layers has been consistently reported for most adhesive systems. The purpose of this study was to determine whether popular specimen preparation techniques that include polishing and acid-bleach treatment modify the a/d interface, mask the complexity of the HL, and lead to inaccurate assessment of the quality of the HL. To understand the impact of specimen preparation techniques on the morphology of the resin- dentin interface, polished and unpolished specimens from the same tooth were closely compared after different acid-bleach chemical treatment procedures. Two one-bottle adhesives, that is, 3M Single Bond and Pulp-dent UNO, exhibiting distinct differences in hydrophilic/hydrophobic composition, were used in this investigation. Using specimens from the same tooth, the effect of chemical treatments on the morphology of the resin- dentin interdiffusion zone and the differences in the morphology of polished and unpolished specimens after these same treatments were studied with scanning electron microscopy. It was shown that conventional specimen preparation techniques that include polishing and acid-bleach treatment can adversely affect and even obscure the structural detail of the a/d interface in specimens that possess a porous HL. The results indicated that the Pulpdent UNO/dentin interface had better quality than the 3M Single Bond/dentin interface. The difference in the quality of HL can be attributed to factors such as compositional differences that impact the adhesive interaction with water, that is present within the substrate during wet bonding. The inability of the conventional acid-bleach procedure to reveal the differences in the scanning electron microscopy interfacial morphology was overcome in this investigation by using a multistep technique.
机译:确定杂化层(HL)质量的最流行技术依赖于酸漂白化学处理之前和之后抛光的粘合剂/牙本质(a / d)界面的形态表征。使用这些技术,对于大多数胶粘剂体系来说,一直存在光滑,耐酸层的报道。这项研究的目的是确定流行的标本制备技术(包括抛光和酸漂白处理)是否会改变a / d界面,掩盖HL的复杂性并导致对HL质量的评估不准确。为了了解标本制备技术对树脂-牙本质界面形态的影响,在使用不同的酸漂白化学处理程序后,将来自同一颗牙齿的抛光和未抛光标本进行了仔细比较。在这项研究中使用了两种单瓶粘合剂,即3M Single Bond和Pulp-dent UNO,它们在亲水/疏水成分上表现出明显的差异。使用同一颗牙齿的标本,通过扫描电子显微镜研究了化学处理对树脂-牙本质互扩散区形态的影响以及经过相同处理后抛光和未抛光标本的形态差异。结果表明,包括抛光和酸漂白处理在内的常规样品制备技术会不利地影响甚至掩盖具有多孔HL的样品中a / d界面的结构细节。结果表明,Pulpdent UNO /牙本质界面的质量优于3M Single Bond /牙本质界面。 HL质量的差异可归因于诸如影响在湿粘合期间存在于基材内的与水的粘合剂相互作用的成分差异之类的因素。在这项研究中,使用多步技术克服了常规酸漂白程序无法揭示扫描电子显微镜界面形态学差异的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号