首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease (CE-MARC) trial
【24h】

Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease (CE-MARC) trial

机译:从冠心病磁共振成像(CE-MARC)试验的临床评价比较疑似冠心病的妇女的心血管磁共振和单光子发射计算机断层扫描技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND - : Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in women, and underdiagnosis contributes to the high mortality. This study compared the sex-specific diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS AND RESULTS - : A total of 235 women and 393 men with suspected angina underwent CMR, SPECT, and x-ray angiography as part of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) study. CMR comprised adenosine stress/rest perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress/rest SPECT was performed with Tc-tetrofosmin. For CMR, the sensitivity in women and men was similar (88.7% versus 85.6%; P=0.57), as was the specificity (83.5% versus 82.8%; P=0.86). For SPECT, the sensitivity was significantly worse in women than in men (50.9% versus 70.8%; P=0.007), but the specificities were similar (84.1% versus 81.3%; P=0.48). The sensitivity in both the female and male groups was significantly higher with CMR than SPECT (P<0.0001 for both), but the specificity was similar (P=0.77 and P=1.00, respectively). For perfusion-only components, CMR outperformed SPECT in women (area under the curve, 0.90 versus 0.67; P<0.0001) and in men (area under the curve, 0.89 versus 0.74; P<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy was similar in both sexes with perfusion CMR (P=1.00) but was significantly worse in women with SPECT (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS - : In both sexes, CMR has greater sensitivity than SPECT. Unlike SPECT, there are no significant sex differences in the diagnostic performance of CMR. These findings, plus an absence of ionizing radiation exposure, mean that CMR should be more widely adopted in women with suspected coronary artery disease.
机译:背景-:冠状动脉疾病是女性死亡的主要原因,而诊断不足会导致高死亡率。这项研究比较了心血管磁共振(CMR)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的性别特异性诊断性能。方法和结果-:总共235例怀疑心绞痛的女性和393例男性进行了CMR,SPECT和X射线血管造影,作为磁共振成像在冠心病(CE-MARC)研究中的临床评估的一部分。 CMR包括腺苷应激/静息灌注,电影成像,enhancement晚期增强和磁共振冠状动脉造影。门控腺苷应激/休息SPECT是用Tc-四氟膦进行的。对于CMR,女性和男性的敏感性相似(88.7%对85.6%; P = 0.57),以及特异性(83.5%对82.8%; P = 0.86)。对于SPECT,女性的敏感性显着低于男性(50.9%对70.8%; P = 0.007),但特异性相似(84.1%对81.3%; P = 0.48)。使用CMR的女性和男性组的敏感性均显着高于SPECT(两者均P <0.0001),但特异性相似(分别为P = 0.77和P = 1.00)。对于仅灌注组件,女性(曲线下面积,0.90对0.67; P <0.0001)和男性(曲线下面积,0.89对0.74; P <0.0001)的CMR优于SPECT。灌注CMR的男女诊断准确性相似(P = 1.00),但SPECT妇女的诊断准确性显着差(P <0.0001)。结论-:无论男女,CMR的敏感性都比SPECT高。与SPECT不同,CMR的诊断性能没有明显的性别差异。这些发现,加上没有电离辐射暴露,意味着在怀疑冠心病的女性中应更广泛地采用CMR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号