...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.
【24h】

Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.

机译:标准和高屈曲后稳定旋转平台可移动式全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: A high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing prosthesis was designed in an attempt to improve the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty without compromising the theoretical advantages of the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing system. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. METHODS: One hundred and seventy knees were randomly allocated to receive either a standard (n = 85) or a high-flexion (n = 85) posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing prosthesis and were followed prospectively for a minimum of two years. Ranges of motion, functional outcomes determined with use of standard scoring systems, and radiographic measurements were assessed. In addition, patients' abilities to perform activities requiring deep knee flexion and patient satisfaction were evaluated with use of questionnaires. RESULTS: The average postoperative maximal flexion was 130 degrees for the knees with the standard design and 128 degrees for those with the high-flexion design, and the difference was not significant. The two prosthetic designs also did not differ significantly with regard to the Knee Society scores; Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores; or the scores on the pain, stiffness, and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). In addition, the numbers of knees able to perform deep-flexion-related activities and the rates of patient satisfaction were similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized study revealed no significant differences between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in terms of clinical or radiographic outcomes or range of motion at a minimum of two years postoperatively.
机译:背景:设计一种高屈曲度的后稳定旋转平台可移动支撑假体,以期在不损害后稳定旋转平台可移动支撑系统的理论优势的情况下,改善全膝关节置换术后的运动范围。这项研究的目的是比较标准和高屈曲后稳定旋转平台移动轴承全膝关节置换的结果。方法:随机分配一百七十个膝关节以接受标准(n = 85)或高屈曲(n = 85)的后稳定旋转平台可移动支撑假体,并进行至少两年的前瞻性随访。评估了运动范围,使用标准评分系统确定的功能结局以及射线照相测量结果。另外,使用问卷调查评估了患者进行需要深屈膝运动和患者满意度的活动的能力。结果:标准设计的膝关节平均术后最大屈曲度为130度,高屈曲设计膝关节的平均术后最大屈曲度为128度,差异无统计学意义。两种假体设计在膝关节评分方面也没有显着差异。特殊外科医院(HSS)分数;或西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)在疼痛,僵硬和功能子量表上的得分。此外,在两个研究组中,能够进行深屈相关活动的膝盖数量和患者满意度均相似。结论:这项前瞻性随机研究显示标准和高屈曲后稳定旋转平台可移动式全膝关节假体在术后至少两年内的临床或影像学结果或运动范围方面无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号