首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Eccentric loading compared with shock wave treatment for chronic insertional achilles tendinopathy. A randomized, controlled trial.
【24h】

Eccentric loading compared with shock wave treatment for chronic insertional achilles tendinopathy. A randomized, controlled trial.

机译:与冲击波治疗相比,偏心负荷治疗慢性跟腱炎。一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of chronic tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon insertion has been poorly studied. With the recently demonstrated effectiveness of eccentric loading and of repetitive low-energy shock wave therapy in patients with midsubstance Achilles tendinopathy, the aim of the present randomized, controlled trial was to verify the effectiveness of both procedures exclusively in patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. METHODS: Fifty patients with chronic (six months or more) recalcitrant insertional Achilles tendinopathy were enrolled in a randomized, controlled study. All patients had received treatment, including local injections of an anesthetic and/or corticosteroids, a prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physiotherapy, without success for at least three months. A computerized random-number generator was used to draw up an allocation schedule. Twenty-five patients were allocated to receive eccentric loading (Group 1), and twenty-five patients were allocated to treatment with repetitive low-energy shock wave therapy (Group 2). Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary follow-up was at four months, and afterward patients were allowed to cross over. The last follow-up evaluation was at one year after completion of the initial treatment. The patients were assessed for pain, function, and activity with use of a validated questionnaire (the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles [VISA-A] questionnaire). RESULTS: At four months from baseline, the mean VISA-A score had increased in both groups, from 53 to 63 points in Group 1 and from 53 to 80 points in Group 2. The mean pain rating decreased from 7 to 5 points in Group 1 and from 7 to 3 points in Group 2. Seven patients (28%) in Group 1 and sixteen patients (64%) in Group 2 reported that they were completely recovered or much improved. For all outcome measures, the group that received shock wave therapy showed significantly more favorable results than the group treated with eccentric loading (p = 0.002 through p = 0.04). At four months, eighteen of the twenty-five patients from Group I had opted to cross over, as did eight of the twenty-five patients from Group 2. The favorable results after shock wave therapy at four months were stable at the one-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Eccentric loading as applied in the present study showed inferior results to low-energy shock wave therapy as applied in patients with chronic recalcitrant tendinopathy of the insertion of the Achilles tendon at four months of follow-up. Further research is warranted to better define the indications for this treatment modality.
机译:背景:跟腱插入的慢性肌腱病的非手术治疗研究很少。随着最近证明偏心负荷和重复性低能量冲击波疗法在中跟腱炎患者中的有效性,本随机对照试验的目的是验证这两种方法仅对插入性跟腱病患者的有效性。方法:将50例患有慢性(六个月或更长时间)顽固性跟腱炎的患者纳入一项随机对照研究。所有患者均接受了治疗,包括麻醉和/或皮质类固醇的局部注射,非甾体类抗炎药的处方以及物理疗法,但至少三个月没有成功。使用计算机化的随机数生成器来制定分配时间表。 25名患者被分配接受偏心负荷(第1组),而25名患者接受了重复性低能量冲击波治疗(第2组)。分析是按意向进行的。初次随访为四个月,之后允许患者交叉。最后的随访评估是在初始治疗完成后的一年。使用经过验证的问卷(维多利亚州运动评估阿喀琉斯研究所[VISA-A]问卷)对患者的疼痛,功能和活动进行评估。结果:在距基线四个月的时间里,两组的平均VISA-A评分均增加,第一组从53分上升至63分,第二组从53分上升至80分。平均疼痛评分从第7组下降至5分从第1组的1分降至7分至3分。第1组的7例患者(28%)和第2组的16例患者(64%)报告他们已完全康复或有很大改善。对于所有结局指标,接受冲击波治疗的组均显示出比偏心负荷治疗组更好的结果(p = 0.002至p = 0.04)。在第四个月时,第一组的二十五名患者中有十八名选择了过渡,第二组的二十五名患者中有八名选择了过渡。在四个月的冲击波治疗后,一年的稳定结果稳定了一年。随访评估。结论:在本研究中应用的偏心负荷显示,在随访四个月的慢性跟腱弯曲性慢性顽固性肌腱病患者中,低能量冲击波治疗的效果较差。有必要进行进一步的研究以更好地定义这种治疗方式的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号