首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
【24h】

ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

机译:ACCF / AHA 2007年临床专家共识文件,关于通过计算机断层扫描在全球心血管风险评估和胸痛患者评估中对冠状动脉钙进行评分:美国心脏病学会基金会临床专家共识工作组(ACCF / AHA撰写委员会的报告)更新有关电子束CT的2000年专家共识文件)。与动脉粥样硬化影像学和预防学会以及心血管计算机断层摄影学会合作开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This document has been developed as a Clinical Expert Consensus Document (CECD), by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention (SAIP) and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). It is intended to provide a perspective on the current state of the role of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by fast computed tomography in clinical practice. Clinical Expert Consensus Documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of the ACCF and AHA concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community. Topics chosen for coverage by expert consensus documents are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or the clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal American Collegeof Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Practice Guidelines process. Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation. Thus, the reader should view the CECD as the best attempt of the ACC and AHA to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or the evidence to date is not widely accepted. When feasible, CECDs include indications or contraindications. Some topics covered by CECDs will be addressed subsequently by the ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines Committee.
机译:该文件已由美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)和美国心脏协会(AHA)与动脉粥样硬化影像学和预防协会(SAIP)和心血管学会合作开发为临床专家共识文件(CECD)。计算机断层扫描(SCCT)。旨在通过临床实践中的快速计算机断层摄影术提供有关冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分作用的当前状态的观点。 《临床专家共识文件》旨在向从业者,付款人和其他有关方告知ACCF和AHA关于临床实践和/或实践社区不断发展或发展的新技术领域的观点。之所以选择专家共识文件所涵盖的主题,是因为设计的证据基础,技术经验和/或临床实践不够成熟,无法由正式的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC / AHA)进行评估)实践指南流程。通常,该主题是正在进行的大量调查的主题。因此,读者应将CECD视为ACC和AHA的最佳尝试,以在尚无确切证据或迄今为止证据尚未广泛接受的领域提供信息并指导临床实践。在可行的情况下,CECD包括适应症或禁忌症。 CECD涵盖的一些主题随后将由ACC / AHA实践准则委员会处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号