首页> 外文期刊>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics >Why DOMA is unconstitutional, beyond the traditional views of same sex relationships
【24h】

Why DOMA is unconstitutional, beyond the traditional views of same sex relationships

机译:为什么DOMA违反宪法,超越了同性关系的传统观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The debate regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is centered on issues of sexuality. Yet, surprisingly within the statute there are no definitions for "man" and "woman." These terms may seem self-evident; however, we would argue that it is not always clear. How would DOMA impact the marriages of two couples in which the gender of one of the spouses is in question? For example two couples present due to infertility: During the evaluations, the wife of couple number one is discovered to be genetically male. She has a 46, XY karyotpe and unde-scended testicles, consistent with the diagnosis of androgen insensitivity. The work-up of couple number two shows that the male partner has severe oligospermia and genetic analysis reveals he has genetic mosaicism (46, XY and 45, XO).
机译:关于《婚姻保护法》(DOMA)的辩论集中在性问题上。然而,令人惊讶的是,该法规中没有“男人”和“女人”的定义。这些术语似乎是不言而喻的。但是,我们认为这并不总是很清楚。 DOMA将如何影响其中一名配偶的性别的两对夫妇的婚姻?例如,由于不育而出现了两对夫妇:在评估期间,发现第一对夫妇的妻子在遗传上是男性。她的睾丸有46个XY核仁和未降下的睾丸,符合对雄激素不敏感的诊断。对第二对夫妇的检查显示,该男性伴侣患有严重的少精子症,而遗传分析表明他患有遗传镶嵌症(46,XY和45,XO)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号