首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied social psychology >The politics of time: Conservatives differentially reference the past and liberals differentially reference the future
【24h】

The politics of time: Conservatives differentially reference the past and liberals differentially reference the future

机译:时间的政治:保守派差异性地参考过去,自由派差异性地参考未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Conservatives are thought to favor certainty and value tradition (suggesting a focus on the past), whereas liberals are thought to favor change (suggesting a focus on the future), even when it is associated with some degree of uncertainty. On this basis, two studies contrasted references to the past versus the future in language usage. Study 1 analyzed 600 texts from conservative and liberal websites. After adjusting for normative differences, a cross-over interaction was obtained: Conservative posts referenced the past to a greater extent than the future and liberal posts referenced the future more than the past. A conceptually parallel cross-over interaction was obtained in Study 2, which analyzed 145 State of the Union addresses. The temporal orientation of conservatives and liberals, then, appears qualitatively different.
机译:保守派被认为有利于确定性和价值传统(建议着眼于过去),而自由主义者被认为赞成变化(建议着眼于未来),即使它与某种程度的不确定性联系在一起。在此基础上,两项研究在语言使用方面对比了过去与未来。研究1分析了来自保守派和自由派网站的600篇文章。在调整了规范差异之后,获得了交叉互动:保守派职位比过去更多地参考了过去,自由派职位比过去更多地提到了未来。研究2中获得了概念上平行的交叉互动,该互动分析了145个国际电联的州地址。因此,保守派和自由派的时间取向在质上是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号