首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied social psychology >Social Risk and Attribution: How Considering the Social Risk of Attributions Can Improve the Performance of Kelley's ANOVA Model in Applied Research
【24h】

Social Risk and Attribution: How Considering the Social Risk of Attributions Can Improve the Performance of Kelley's ANOVA Model in Applied Research

机译:社会风险和归因:考虑归因的社会风险如何改善凯利ANOVA模型在应用研究中的绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Classic models of attribution are increasingly used, despite serious problems with their empirical validation. This study revisits Kelley's (1967) ANOVA model of attribution and argues that it will most usefully predict attributions when attributional processes are socially "safe" and have few social consequences. The results demonstrate that attributions are most likely to be inconsistent with Kelley's predictions when attributional information and the attributions themselves are socially consequential or risky, but are more likely to be made as predicted when they are socially safe. Applications of Kelley's model, therefore, should pay attention to the extent to which attributions and attributional information are socially consequential or risky, particularly when analyzing the use of consensus information.
机译:尽管经验证明存在严重问题,但经典的归因模型仍在使用。这项研究回顾了Kelley(1967)的归因模型,并认为当归因过程在社会上“安全”且几乎没有社会后果时,它将最有用地预测归因。结果表明,当归因信息和归因本身具有社会后果或风险时,归因最有可能与Kelley的预测不一致,但当它们对社会安全时,则更有可能按预测进行归因。因此,Kelley模型的应用应注意归因和归因信息在社会上是必然的或具有风险的程度,尤其是在分析共识信息的使用时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号