首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >Provenance research by INAA on ancient Chinese white porcelain excavated from the Maojiawan site of Beijing
【24h】

Provenance research by INAA on ancient Chinese white porcelain excavated from the Maojiawan site of Beijing

机译:INAA对北京毛家湾遗址出土的中国古代白瓷的种源研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

More than one million shards of ancient Chinese porcelain were excavated at the Maojiawan pit in Beijing in September 2005. Among these shards, four types of ancient Chinese white porcelain were identified. The ages and provenances of three of these types of porcelain were accurately determined by archaeologists based on typology. However, different archaeologists interpreted the other/fourth type differently. According to the colour of the porcelain body, it was easily identified as the product of the Jingdezhen kilns of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 AD). However, based on the vessel shape, this fourth type of porcelain was also identified as the product of the Cizhou kilns of the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368 AD). In order to determine the provenance of this type of ancient Chinese white porcelain, 131 shards comprising the four types of white porcelain identified at the site were selected as experimental specimens and analysed by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA). After the processing of experimental data by principal component analysis and geochemical analysis, the results show that the provenance of this type of ancient Chinese white porcelain is the Jingdezhen, not the Cizhou kiln.
机译:2005年9月,在北京的毛家湾坑内挖掘了超过一百万个中国古代瓷器碎片。在这些碎片中,鉴定出四种类型的中国古代白瓷。考古学家根据类型学准确地确定了其中三种瓷器的年龄和出处。但是,不同的考古学家对另一种/第四种类型的解释不同。根据瓷器的颜色,很容易确定它是明朝(公元1368-1644年)景德镇窑的产物。然而,根据器皿的形状,这第四种瓷器也被认为是元代慈州窑的产品(公元1271-1368年)。为了确定这种类型的中国古代白瓷的出处,选择了在现场鉴定出的包括四种白瓷的131个碎片作为实验标本,并通过仪器中子活化分析(INAA)进行了分析。通过主成分分析和地球化学分析对实验数据进行处理后,结果表明,这种类型的中国古代白瓷的来源是景德镇,而不是慈州窑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号