首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >New insights into the origins of oracle bone divination: Ancient DNA from Late Neolithic Chinese bovines
【24h】

New insights into the origins of oracle bone divination: Ancient DNA from Late Neolithic Chinese bovines

机译:甲骨文占卜起源的新见解:新石器时代晚期中国牛的古代DNA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Domestic taurine cattle (Bos taurus) were introduced to China from Central Asia between 3600 and 2000 cal BCE. Most of the earliest domestic cattle remains in China come from sacrificial or ritual contexts, especially in the form of oracle bones used in divination rituals. These oracle bones became closely tied to royal authority and are the source of the earliest written inscriptions in ancient China. In this article, we use ancient DNA to identify uninscribed bovine oracle bones from the Longshan period archaeological sites of Taosi and Zhoujiazhuang (late third millennium BCE). We found that in addition to making oracle bones out of domestic cattle scapulae, people also used aurochs (wild cattle: Bos primigenius) scapulae for oracle bone divination. Wild water buffalo (Bubalus mephistopheles) were also exploited at Zhoujiazhuang, but we did not identify water buffalo oracle bones in our analysis. We propose some morphological criteria that may be useful for distinguishing between these animals, but conclude that it is not always possible to identify bovine scapulae based on morphology alone. Our results indicate that wild and domestic bovines were sometimes present at the same sites and their bones were used in similar ways to make oracle bones. This raises the possibility that these species interbred and that people in ancient China may have experimented with managing indigenous Chinese wild bovines. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在公元前3600年至2000年之间,中亚牛磺酸从中亚引入中国。在中国,大多数最早的家畜残骸都来自祭祀或仪式环境,尤其是占卜仪式中使用的甲骨形式。这些甲骨文与王室权威紧密相连,是中国古代最早的文字铭文的来源。在本文中,我们使用古代DNA从陶山和周家庄(公元前三千年晚期)的龙山时代考古遗址中鉴定出未刻印的牛甲骨。我们发现,除了用家养牛肩cap骨制作甲骨之外,人们还使用金头(野牛:Bos primigenius)肩cap骨进行甲骨占卜。周家庄还利用了野生水牛(Bubalus mephistopheles),但在分析中我们没有发现水牛甲骨。我们提出了一些形态学标准,可能有助于区分这些动物,但得出的结论是,并非总是能够仅根据形态学来鉴定牛肩s骨。我们的结果表明,野生和家养的牛有时会出现在相同的位置,并且它们的骨头以类似的方式用于制作甲骨。这增加了这些物种杂交的可能性,也增加了中国古代人们尝试管理中国本土野牛的可能性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号