首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >Tropical ancient DNA from bulk archaeological fish bone reveals the subsistence practices of a historic coastal community in southwest Madagascar
【24h】

Tropical ancient DNA from bulk archaeological fish bone reveals the subsistence practices of a historic coastal community in southwest Madagascar

机译:来自大量考古鱼骨的热带古代DNA揭示了马达加斯加西南部一个历史悠久的沿海社区的生存实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Taxonomic identification of archaeological fish bones provides important insights into the subsistence practices of ancient coastal peoples. However, it can be difficult to execute robust morphological identification of fish bones from species-rich fossil assemblages, especially from post-cranial material with few distinguishing features. Fragmentation, weathering and burning further impede taxonomic identification, resulting in large numbers of unidentifiable bones from archaeological sites. This limitation can be somewhat mitigated by taking an ancient DNA (aDNA) bulk-bone metabarcoding (BBM) approach to faunal identification, where DNA from non-diagnostic bone fragments is extracted and sequenced in parallel. However, a large proportion of fishing communities (both past and present) live in tropical regions that have sub-optimal conditions for long-term aDNA preservation. To date, the BBM method has never been applied to fish bones before, or to fossils excavated from an exposed context within a tropical climate. Here, we demonstrate that morphologically indistinct bulk fish bone from the tropics can be identified by sequencing aDNA extracted from 100 to 300 ya archaeological midden material in southwest Madagascar. Despite the biases of the approach, we rapidly obtained family, genus, and species level assemblage information, and used this to describe a subset of the ichthyofauna exploited by an 18th century fishing community. We identified 23 families of fish, including benthic, pelagic, and coral dwelling fishes, suggesting a reliance on a variety of marine and brackish habitats. When possible, BBM should be used alongside osteological approaches to address the limitations of both; however, this study highlights how genetic methods can nevertheless be a valuable tool for helping resolve faunal assemblages when morphological identification is hindered by taphonomic processes, lack of adequate comparative collections, and time constraints, and can provide a temporal perspective on fish biodiversity in the context of accelerated exploitation of the marine environment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:考古鱼骨的分类学识别为古代沿海人民的生存实践提供了重要的见识。但是,可能很难从物种丰富的化石组合中,尤其是从颅后材料中区分特征很少的地方,对鱼骨进行可靠的形态学识别。碎片,风化和燃烧进一步阻碍了分类学鉴定,从而导致大量考古遗址无法鉴定的骨头。通过采用古老的DNA(aDNA)大块骨元条形码(BBM)方法进行动物区系识别,可以从某种程度上缓解这种局限性,其中从非诊断性骨碎片中提取DNA并进行并行测序。但是,很大一部分的捕捞社区(过去和现在)生活在热带地区,这些地区对aDNA的长期保存没有理想的条件。迄今为止,BBM方法以前从未应用于鱼骨,也从未应用于热带气候下从暴露环境中挖掘出的化石。在这里,我们证明,通过对从马达加斯加西南部100至300 ya考古中层材料中提取的aDNA进行测序,可以鉴定出热带地区形态不清晰的大鱼骨。尽管该方法存在偏见,但我们还是迅速获得了科,属和物种级别的组合信息,并使用它来描述了18世纪捕捞鱼类开发的鱼科鱼类的子集。我们确定了23种鱼类,其中包括底栖鱼类,中上层鱼类和珊瑚栖鱼类,这表明它们对各种海洋和咸淡生境的依赖。如果可能,BBM应与骨科方法一起使用,以解决两者的局限性;但是,这项研究强调了当遗传学方法,缺乏足够的比较收集和时间限制阻碍了形态学鉴定时,遗传方法如何仍然可以成为帮助解决动物群落的有价值的工具,并且可以提供有关鱼类生物多样性的时空观点。加速开发海洋环境。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号