首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >The Greek and Asiatic marbles of the Florentine Niobids
【24h】

The Greek and Asiatic marbles of the Florentine Niobids

机译:佛罗伦萨尼奥比德斯的希腊和亚洲大理石

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The provenance of the marbles used for ten Niobids sculptures discovered at Rome in 1583 and now at the Uffizi Galleries in Florence has been determined using a well-established multi-method approach including isotopic, petrographic and EPR data. An eleventh sculpture (inv. 304) that is not part of the original group but has been long associated with it has also been investigated. The results partly confirm the belief that the marble of several Niobids is Pentelic, but also identify statues such as the Niobe group, the elder Niobid and others that were made using Asiatic marbles from Docimium and Goktepe. Sculptures still considered to be Pentelic are, in fact, Asiatic, whereas statues that were assumed to be Asiatic are Pentelic. Marble data support the opinion that different ateliers contributed to the work and group the sculptures in agreement with the results of stylistic analysis as proposed by various scholars. Provenance data in connection with archaeological and art-historical results allow to formulate possible hypotheses on the way this famous and complex group of sculptures was assembled. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:1583年在罗马,现在在佛罗伦萨的乌菲兹美术馆发现了十个Niobids雕塑所用的大理石,其来源已通过一种完善的多方法方法确定,包括同位素,岩石学和EPR数据。还研究了第11幅雕塑(inv。304),该雕塑不是原始雕塑的一部分,但长期以来与之相关。结果部分证实了一些尼奥比德人的大理石是奔特力克的信念,而且还鉴定出像尼奥贝集团,尼奥比德长者以及使用Docimium和Goktepe的亚洲大理石制成的其他雕像。实际上,仍然被认为是Pentelic的雕塑是亚洲风格的,而被认为是Asiatic的雕像则是Pentelic。大理石数据支持这样的观点,即不同的工作室对这项工作做出了贡献,并且将雕塑与各种学者提出的风格分析结果相一致。与考古和艺术史研究结果相关的出处数据,可以就这一著名而复杂的雕塑作品的组装方式提出可能的假设。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号