...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Examining the Effects of Differential Item (Functioning and Differential) Test Functioning on Selection Decisions: When Are Statistically Significant Effects Practically Important?
【24h】

Examining the Effects of Differential Item (Functioning and Differential) Test Functioning on Selection Decisions: When Are Statistically Significant Effects Practically Important?

机译:检验差异项(功能和差异)测试功能对选择决策的影响:什么时候统计上显着的影响实际上很重要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Item response theory differential test functioning (DTF) methods are often used to address issues in personnel selection, but the results are frequently difficult to interpret because statistically significant findings may have little practical importance. In this article, the authors proposed 2 effect size measures for DTF. One related DTF to mean raw score differences across groups; the other related DTF to the 4/5th rule for adverse impact at successive cut scores. The effects of DTF were examined in the context of personality assessment, professional licensure, and college admissions. Overall, the result indicated that although many items exhibited bias in analyses of the large samples, the net magnitudes of effect on potential selection decisions were nugatory.
机译:项目响应理论的差异测试功能(DTF)方法通常用于解决人员选择中的问题,但是由于统计意义上的重大发现可能几乎没有实际意义,因此结果通常难以解释。在本文中,作者提出了DTF的2种效果大小度量。一种相关的DTF表示各组之间的原始分数差异;另一个将DTF与第4/5条规则相关联,以在连续切割得分时产生不利影响。在人格评估,专业执照和大学录取的背景下检查了DTF的效果。总体而言,结果表明,尽管许多项目在对大样本的分析中表现出偏见,但对潜在选择决策的净影响程度却是无效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号