The appeals court - agreeing with the U.S.District Court for the Northern District of Ohio - ruled that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers was correct in not issuing Norton Construction's permit for a new landfill project due to a provision in a 2005 appropriations bill.The appeals court ruled that the Corps reasonably interpreted a proviso in a 2005 appropriations bill barring it from supporting any activities related to new landfills "in the Muskingum Watershed" as covering Norton's project.Also,it said,the law did not violate Norton's constitutional rights.
展开▼
机译：上诉法院-同意美国俄亥俄州北部地区的USDistrict法院-裁定，由于2005年拨款法案中的一项规定，美国陆军工程兵团（USArmy Engineers of Engineers）不签发Norton Construction的新垃圾填埋项目许可证是正确的。法院裁定，该军团在2005年拨款法案中合理解释了一项附带条件，禁止其支持与“马斯金格姆流域”中新填埋场有关的任何活动都涵盖了诺顿的项目。此外，该法律还没有违反诺顿的宪法权利。
展开▼
