首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Right ventricular dysfunction in chronic thromboembolic obstruction of the pulmonary artery: a pressure-volume study using the conductance catheter
【24h】

Right ventricular dysfunction in chronic thromboembolic obstruction of the pulmonary artery: a pressure-volume study using the conductance catheter

机译:慢性肺动脉血栓栓塞性梗阻中的右心功能不全:使用电导导管的压力容量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Pressure-volume loops describe dynamic ventricular performance, relevant to patients with and at risk of pulmonary hypertension. We used conductance catheter-derived pressure-volume loops to measure right ventricular (RV) mechanics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary arterial obstruction at different stages of pathological adaptation. Resting conductance catheterization was performed in 24 patients: 10 with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), 7 with chronic thromboembolic disease without pulmonary hypertension (CTED), and 7 controls. To assess the validity of conductance measurements, RV volumes were compared in a subset of 8 patients with contemporaneous cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Control, CTED, and CTEPH groups showed different pressure-volume loop morphology, most notable during systolic ejection. Prolonged diastolic relaxation was seen in patients with CTED and CTEPH [tau = 56.2+-6.7 (controls) vs. 69.7+-10.0 (CTED) vs. 67.9+-6.2 ms (CTEPH), P = 0.02]. Control and CTED groups had lower afterload (Ea) and contractility (Ees) compared with the CTEPH group (Ea = 0.30+-0.10 vs. 0.52+-0.24 vs. 1.92+-0.70 mmHg/ml, respectively, P < 0.001) (Ees = 0.44+-0.20 vs. 0.59+-0.15 vs. 1.13+-0.43 mmHg/ml, P < 0.01) with more efficient ventriculoarterial coupling (Ees/Ea = 1.46+-0.30 vs. 1.27+-0.36 vs. 0.60 ±0.18, respectively, P < 0.001). Stroke volume assessed by CMR and conductance showed closest agreement (mean bias +9 ml, 95% CI - 1 to +19 ml) compared with end-diastolic volume (+48 ml, -16 to 111 ml) and end-systolic volume (+37 ml, -21 to 94 ml). RV conductance catheterization detects novel alteration in pressure-volume loop morphology and delayed RV relaxation in CTED, which distinguish this group from controls. The observed agreement in stroke volume assessed by CMR and conductance suggests RV mechanics are usefully measured by conductance catheter in chronic thromboembolic obstruction.
机译:压力-容积环描述了动态心室功能,与患有肺动脉高压并有肺动脉高压风险的患者有关。我们使用电导导管得出的压力-容积环来测量在病理适应不同阶段的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉阻塞患者的右心室(RV)力学。在24例患者中进行了静息电导导管插入术:10例患有慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH),7例患有慢性血栓栓塞性疾病而无肺动脉高压(CTED)和7例对照。为了评估电导测量的有效性,在8例同时发生心脏磁共振(CMR)的患者中比较了RV量。对照组,CTED和CTEPH组显示出不同的压力-体积环形态,最明显的是在收缩期射血期间。在CTED和CTEPH患者中观察到舒张期延长[tau = 56.2 + -6.7(对照)对69.7 + -10.0(CT​​ED)对67.9 + -6.2 ms(CTEPH),P = 0.02]。与CTEPH组相比,对照组和CTED组的后负荷(Ea)和收缩力(Ees)较低(Ea = 0.30 + -0.10 vs.0.52 + -0.24 vs.1.92 + -0.70 mmHg / ml,P <0.001)( Ees = 0.44 + -0.20对0.59 + -0.15对1.13 + -0.43 mmHg / ml,P <0.01),心室-动脉耦合更有效(Ees / Ea = 1.46 + -0.30对1.27 + -0.36对0.60±分别为0.18和P <0.001)。通过CMR和电导评估的卒中量显示出最接近的一致性(平均偏差+9 ml,95%CI-1至+19 ml),而舒张末期容积(+48 ml,-16至111 ml)和收缩末期容积( +37毫升,-21至94毫升)。右室传导率导管插入术可检测CTED中压力-容积环形态的新变化和右室弛豫延迟,从而将这一组与对照组区分开。通过CMR和电导评估的卒中量观察到的一致性表明,在慢性血栓栓塞性阻塞中,可通过电导导管有效地测量RV力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号