...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Specificity of belief domains in OCD: validation of the French version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and a comparison across samples.
【24h】

Specificity of belief domains in OCD: validation of the French version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and a comparison across samples.

机译:OCD中信念域的特异性:验证法语版《强迫信念问卷》并进行样本间比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper assesses the psychometric properties of the French version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ-44) and investigates whether the questionnaire discriminates between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxious control (AC), and non-clinical control (NCC) participants. A confirmatory factor analysis suggested a poor fit of the model. An exploratory factor analysis replicated the original factor structure. The subscales were moderately intercorrelated and highly correlated with the total score. There was partial support for convergent/divergent validity of the OBQ-44. In analyses of variance comparing the three samples, the participants in the OCD sample scored significantly higher than the participants in the AC and NCC samples on all of the OBQ-44 scores. In analyses of covariance comparing the OCD and NCC samples while controlling for general distress and age, the participants with OCD scored significantly higher than the NCC participants on all of the OBQ-44 scores. Implications of the current study are discussed.
机译:本文评估了法语版《强迫信念问卷》(OBQ-44)的心理计量学特性,并调查了问卷是否区分强迫症(OCD),焦虑控制(AC)和非临床控制(NCC)参与者。验证性因素分析表明该模型不适合。探索性因素分析复制了原始因素结构。子量表具有中等相关性,并且与总分高度相关。有人对OBQ-44的收敛/分歧有效性表示部分支持。在比较这三个样本的方差分析中,在所有OBQ-44分数上,OCD样本的参与者的得分均显着高于AC和NCC样本的参与者。在比较OCD和NCC样本同时控制总体困扰和年龄的协方差分析中,OCD参与者在所有OBQ-44分数上的得分均显着高于NCC参与者。讨论了当前研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号