首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Preliminary factor and psychometric analysis of the Motivation for Fear (MOTIF) survey.
【24h】

Preliminary factor and psychometric analysis of the Motivation for Fear (MOTIF) survey.

机译:恐惧动机(MOTIF)调查的初步因素和心理分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To address the call for evidence-based functional assessments, this study determined the factor structure and psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, convergent and discriminant validity) of the Motivation for Fear (MOTIF) survey, a newly created, 24-item functional measure of fear and anxiety. Participants were 1277 college students (ages 18-35 years; 74.7% female). A separate questionnaire verified presence of anxiety symptoms, resulting in 583 participants. Exploratory factory analysis, scree plot, parallel analysis, and oblique rotation, were used. Results converged on a 4-factor simple structure solution with 18 items. The functions (distress, attention/comfort-seeking, tangible, and escape) explained 43% of the variance and internal consistency was above .70 for distress and attention/comfort-seeking. The distress and attention/comfort-seeking functions demonstrated clear reliability and support was found for discriminant and convergent construct validity of the MOTIF. Evidence was lacking regarding functional convergent validity, however. Implications for the findings and potential for clinical use are discussed.
机译:为了满足对基于证据的功能评估的呼吁,本研究确定了恐惧动机(MOTIF)调查的一项因素结构和心理计量学特性(即,可靠性,收敛性和判别效度),这是一项新创建的24项功能评估,恐惧和焦虑。参加者为1277名大学生(年龄在18-35岁之间;女性为74.7%)。另一份问卷调查证实了焦虑症状的存在,导致583名参与者。使用了探索性工厂分析,碎石图,平行分析和倾斜旋转。结果收敛于包含18个项目的4因子简单结构解决方案。函数(遇险,关注/寻求帮助,有形和逃避)解释了43%的差异,内部一致性在遇险和关注/寻求帮助上大于0.70。遇险和关注/寻求舒适功能显示出明显的可靠性,并为MOTIF的判别和收敛构造有效性找到了支持。但是,缺乏关于功能收敛效度的证据。讨论的发现和临床应用的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号