首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology >Efficiency of conventional sampling methods for determining arthropoddensities in close-row soybeans
【24h】

Efficiency of conventional sampling methods for determining arthropoddensities in close-row soybeans

机译:传统采样方法确定近排大豆节肢动物密度的效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Relative efficiencies of sweep-net, vertical beat sheet, and ground cloth sampling methods for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] arthopods were evaluated by relative net precision criteria in close-row (drilled) soybeans and in conventionally planted soybeans. Accuracy and precision were determined by fidelity of relative sample means to arthropod means from an absolute method. Fidelity to absolute population density was high in both drilled and conventional soybeans for all relative methods except the sweep-net for soybean loopers, Pseudoplusia includens (Walker). The ground cloth method provided the highest degree of accuracy in both field types, but the sweep-net showed a comparable degree of fidelity for common pests in drilled fields. Precision of sampling methods in drilled soybeans, determined by direct comparisons of relative variation of samples for each of the sampling techniques, was best for the sweep-net for pentatomids and velvetbean caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis Hubner. The ground cloth yielded lower relative variations than other methods for lepidopterous larvae in conventional soybeans. For all arthropod species in drilled soybeans, exclusive of soybean loopers in both years, the sweep-net method resulted in a, higher relative efficiency (higher relative precision per unit of cost) than the ground cloth and vertical beat sheet because the cost was low in work-hours required to obtain a satisfactory level of accuracy and precision.
机译:在近行(钻孔)大豆和常规种植的大豆中,通过相对净精度标准对大豆[Glycine max(L.)Merrill]节肢动物的扫网,垂直拍打和地面采样方法的相对效率进行了评估。准确性和精密度是通过绝对方法通过相对样品手段相对于节肢动物手段的保真度来确定的。对于所有相对方法,在钻孔大豆和常规大豆中,对绝对种群密度的保真度都很高,但大豆套圈器,假正plus包括物(Walker)的扫网除外。地布方法在两种田间类型中都提供了最高的准确度,但扫网显示出钻孔田间常见害虫的保真度相当。通过直接比较每种采样技术的样品相对变化而确定的钻探大豆采样方法的精度,最适用于五倍体和天鹅绒毛虫(Anticarsia gemmatalis Hubner)的扫网。与常规大豆中鳞翅目幼虫的其他方法相比,该地面布产生的相对变化较小。对于这两年中钻过的大豆中的所有节肢动物物种(不包括大豆套环),由于成本较低,后掠网法的相对效率(每单位成本的相对精度更高)比底布和垂直拍打板更高。才能获得令人满意的精度和精密度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号