首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >Illegal Evictions? Overwriting Possession and Orality with Law's Violence in Cambodia
【24h】

Illegal Evictions? Overwriting Possession and Orality with Law's Violence in Cambodia

机译:非法搬迁?柬埔寨法律暴力覆盖财产和口头行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The unfolding of a juridico-cadastral system in present-day Cambodia is at odds with local understandings of landholding, which are entrenched in notions of community consensus and existing occupation. The discrepancy between such orally recognized antecedents and the written word of law have been at the heart of the recent wave of dispossessions that has swept across the country. Contra the standard critique that corruption has set the tone, this paper argues that evictions in Cambodia are often literally underwritten by the articles of law. Whereas 'possession' is a well-understood and accepted concept in Cambodia, a cultural basis rooted in what fames C. Scott refers to as 'orality', coupled with a long history of subsistence agriculture, semi-nomadic lifestyles, barter economies and — until recently — widespread land availability have all ensured that notions of'property' are vague among the country's majority rural poor. In drawing a firm distinction between possessions and property, where the former is premised upon actual use and the latter is embedded in exploitation, this paper examines how proprietorship is inextricably bound to the violence of law.
机译:在当今柬埔寨,司法-地籍制度的发展与当地对土地所有权的理解相矛盾,后者对社区共识和现有占领的观念根深蒂固。这种口头认可的先例与法律文字之间的差异一直是最近席卷全国的剥夺浪潮的核心。与标准的批评为腐败定下基调相反,本文认为柬埔寨的驱逐往往是由法律条款真正承保的。在柬埔寨,“占有”是一个易于理解和接受的概念,而文化基础则源于成名的斯科特(C. Scott)所说的“口头”,再加上悠久的自给自足农业,半游牧的生活方式,易货经济和-直到最近-广泛的土地供应都确保“财产”的概念在该国大多数农村贫困人口中是模糊的。在对财产和财产进行牢固的区分时,前者以实际使用为前提,而后者则以剥削为基础,本文研究了所有权如何与法律的暴力密不可分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号