...
首页> 外文期刊>Japanese journal of clinical oncology. >Combined measurement of serum sialyl Lewis X with serum CA15-3 in breast cancer patients.
【24h】

Combined measurement of serum sialyl Lewis X with serum CA15-3 in breast cancer patients.

机译:乳腺癌患者血清唾液酸化Lewis X与血清CA15-3的联合测定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Serum CA15-3 has been one of the most reliable tumor markers used in monitoring breast cancer patients; however, its sensitivity in detecting metastases is limited. To increase its sensitivity, the combined measurement of other tumor markers with CA15-3 was investigated. METHODS: Serum CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and sialyl Lewis X (CSLEX) were simultaneously measured in a prospective series of 455 postoperative breast cancer patients with or without metastasis. The diagnostic parameters sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for detecting metastases were compared. The correlation of values between pairs of tumor markers was analyzed. The efficacy of combined measurement of two different tumor markers was also evaluated. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detecting metastases was 61.5, 56.9 and 52.3%; specificity was 97.2, 93.6 and 96.2%; PPV was 78.4, 59.7 and 69.4%; NPV was 93.8, 92.9 and 92.4%; and accuracy was 92.1, 88.8 and 89.9% for CA15-3, CEA and CSLEX, respectively. The values for CA15-3 were significantly correlated with those for CEA (P < 0.001) but not those for CSLEX. The combined measurement of CSLEX and CA15-3 increased the sensitivity by 17.0% but that of CEA and CA15-3 increased the sensitivity by only 10.8%. All diagnostic parameters for the combined measurement of CSLEX and CA15-3 were higher than those for the combined measurement of CEA and CA15-3. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CSLEX may be more useful than CEA in combination with CA15-3 in monitoring breast cancer patients. The results of this study suggest that CSLEX may be more useful than CEA in combination with CA15-3 in monitoring breast cancer patients.
机译:背景:血清CA15-3已成为监测乳腺癌患者最可靠的肿瘤标志物之一。但是,它在检测转移灶方面的敏感性是有限的。为了提高其敏感性,研究了其他肿瘤标志物与CA15-3的组合测量。方法:对455例有或无转移的术后乳腺癌患者,同时测定其血清CA15-3,癌胚抗原(CEA)和唾液酸路易斯X(CSLEX)。比较诊断参数的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和检测转移的准确性。分析了成对的肿瘤标志物之间的值的相关性。还评估了两种不同肿瘤标志物联合测量的功效。结果:检测转移的敏感性为61.5、56.9和52.3%;特异性为97.2%,93.6%和96.2%; PPV为78.4、59.7和69.4%;净现值分别为93.8、92.9和92.4%; CA15-3,CEA和CSLEX的准确度分别为92.1%,88.8%和89.9%。 CA15-3的值与CEA的值显着相关(P <0.001),而CSLEX的值则不相关。 CSLEX和CA15-3的组合测量将灵敏度提高了17.0%,而CEA和CA15-3的组合测量仅将灵敏度提高了10.8%。 CSLEX和CA15-3组合测量的所有诊断参数均高于CEA和CA15-3组合测量的所有诊断参数。结论:这些发现表明CSLEX结合CA15-3在监测乳腺癌患者方面可能比CEA更有用。这项研究的结果表明,CSLEX可能比CEA结合CA15-3在监测乳腺癌患者方面更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号