...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Benefits and limitations of nurses taking on aspects of the clinical role of doctors in primary care: integrative literature review.
【24h】

Benefits and limitations of nurses taking on aspects of the clinical role of doctors in primary care: integrative literature review.

机译:护士在基层医疗中承担医生临床角色的好处和局限性:综合文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: This paper presents an integrative literature review of studies exploring the benefits and limitations of the recent expansion of the clinical role of nurses working in general practice in the United Kingdom. BACKGROUND: Similar clinical outcomes and high levels of satisfaction with consultations undertaken by nurse practitioners compared to general practitioners in primary care have been reported in a Cochrane review [Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2004) vol. 5, p. CD001271]. Since then, nurse consultations have increased considerably as general practitioners have delegated part of their clinical workload to other general practice nurses. However, whether all general practice nurses can fulfil this extended role remains open to question. METHOD: An integrative review was performed. Nine electronic databases were searched. UK studies were included if they were published after the previous Cochrane review, i.e. between 2004 and 2009. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, most using qualitative methodology. The evidence suggested that the changes in nurses' role have been predominantly driven by the perceived increase in workload arising from the new general practitioner contract. Delegating work to nurses provided a means of organizing workload within a practice without necessarily allowing patient choice. Patients generally thought that all general practice nurses would be able to deal with simple conditions, but they would prefer to consult with a general practitioner if they thought it necessary. There were concerns about nurses' knowledge base, particularly in diagnostics and therapeutics, and their levels of training and competence in roles formerly undertaken by general practitioners. CONCLUSION: There have been few studies in this key area of healthcare policy. There is a need for better training and support for nurses undertaking roles in consultation and for patients' views to be better represented.
机译:目的:本文提供了一项综合性文献综述,这些研究探讨了英国普通科护士最近临床作用扩大的益处和局限性。背景:在Cochrane评论中[Cochrane系统评价数据库(2004),第1卷,2007年]报道了与初级保健医生相比,护士执业医生与普通执业医生进行的咨询相似的临床结果和较高的满意度。 5,第CD001271]。从那时起,由于全科医生将部分临床工作量委托给其他全科护士,护士的咨询量大大增加。但是,所有全科护士是否都能担当起这一扩展的角色仍有待商question。方法:进行了综合审查。搜索了九个电子数据库。如果英国的研究是在先前的Cochrane审查后发表的,即在2004年至2009年之间发表的,则包括在内。结果:确定了八项研究,大多数使用定性方法。有证据表明,护士角色的变化主要是由于新的全科医生合同引起的工作量的增加。将工作委托给护士提供了一种在实践中组织工作量的方法,而不必允许患者选择。患者通常认为所有的全科医生都可以应付简单的病情,但如果他们认为有必要,他们宁愿咨询全科医生。人们担心护士的知识库,尤其是诊断和治疗方面的知识,以及他们以前由全科医生担任的角色的培训水平和能力。结论:在医疗政策这一关键领域的研究很少。有必要为承担咨询职责的护士提供更好的培训和支持,并更好地表达患者的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号