首页> 外文期刊>Journal of affective disorders >How to initiate lithium therapy: A systematic review of dose estimation and level prediction methods
【24h】

How to initiate lithium therapy: A systematic review of dose estimation and level prediction methods

机译:如何开始锂疗法:剂量估算和水平预测方法的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Throughout the past decades, several methods have been developed to achieve therapeutic lithium blood levels as quick and safe as possible. The present study will systematically review the methods developed and studied for lithium dose estimation or level prediction at the initiation of therapy. Methods: A systematic computerized Medline search was performed for papers published in English, French or Dutch between 1966 and April 2012 describing or studying methods for dosing lithium or predicting the lithium level on a certain dosage. References of relevant articles were screened for additional papers. Results: Of 273 unique references retrieved, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Apart from the empirical titration method, 38 predictive methods for initiating lithium were identified. These methods can be classified into two categories: the a priori predictive methods, and the test-dose predictive methods requiring the administration of a test dose of lithium prior to starting treatment. Limitations: The methodological strength was not taken into account for a study to be included in the review. Conclusions: The most important distinction between the empirical titration method and the predictive methods appears to be the shorter time the latter need to achieve the targeted lithium level. The vast majority of predictive methods, however, show inconsistent or poor results or have not been replicated since their initial description. The empirical titration method, although not extensively studied, appears to be a time-honored method that can be recommended for use in daily clinical practice. ? 2012 Elsevier B.V.
机译:背景:在过去的几十年中,已经开发出几种方法来尽可能快和安全地达到治疗性锂血液水平。本研究将在治疗开始时系统地回顾开发和研究的用于锂剂量估算或水平预测的方法。方法:对1966年至2012年4月之间以英语,法语或荷兰语发表的描述或研究定量锂剂量或预测一定剂量锂水平的方法的论文进行了系统的计算机化Medline搜索。筛选了相关文章的参考文献以查找其他论文。结果:在检索到的273个唯一参考文献中,有65个符合纳入标准。除了经验滴定法外,还确定了38种引发锂的预测方法。这些方法可分为两类:先验预测方法和需要在开始治疗前给予测试剂量锂的测试剂量预测方法。局限性:没有将方法学强度纳入考虑范围内的研究。结论:经验滴定法和预测方法之间最重要的区别似乎是后者需要更短的时间才能达到目标锂水平。但是,绝大多数预测方法显示出不一致或较差的结果,或者自从最初描述以来就没有重复。经验滴定法尽管没有得到广泛研究,但似乎是一种历史悠久的方法,可推荐用于日常临床实践中。 ? 2012年Elsevier B.V.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号