首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anesthesia >Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy
【24h】

Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy

机译:罗格溴铵在电惊厥治疗期间使用三种不同剂量的舒马葡糖和琥珀酰胆碱逆转后罗库溴铵所致肌肉松弛的恢复时间比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: This study was conducted to compare recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex with succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Methods: Seventeen patients who were scheduled to undergo ECT were studied. Anesthesia was induced by use of propofol (1.0 mg/kg) followed by either succinylcholine (SCC) (1 mg/kg) or rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Assisted mask ventilation was initiated with 100% oxygen. After T1 was assessed as being zero by neuromuscular monitoring, an electroshock stimulus was applied bilaterally. Patients receiving rocuronium were infused with 16, 8, or 4 mg/kg sugammadex immediately after the seizure stopped to reverse the muscle relaxation. Neuromuscular monitoring was continued until recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 at the tibial nerve in the leg. The times to recovery of T1 to 10 and 90% with both relaxants were compared. Results: The time to recovery of T1 to 90% after 16 mg/kg sugammadex was shorter than that in subjects treated with SCC (p = 0.046), whereas that after 4 mg/kg sugammadex was longer than that in subjects treated with SCC (SCC group: 429 ± 65 s, 16 mg/kg sugammadex group: 387 ± 63 s, 8 mg/kg sugammadex group: 462 ± 66 s, 4 mg/kg sugammadex group: 563 ± 45 s ,#;p 0.05 compared with SCC, # p 0.01 compared with 16 mg/kg sugammadex). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the efficacy of rocuronium-sugammadex as an alternative to SCC for muscle relaxation during ECT, and indicates that 8 mg/kg sugammadex produces equally rapid recovery from rocuronium muscular relaxation compared with spontaneous recovery from 1 mg/kg SCC during ECT.
机译:目的:进行这项研究的目的是比较在电惊厥治疗(ECT)期间使用三种不同剂量的舒马得克斯与琥珀酰胆碱逆转罗库溴铵所致肌肉松弛的恢复时间。方法:对计划接受ECT的17例患者进行研究。通过使用异丙酚(1.0 mg / kg),然后使用琥珀酰胆碱(SCC)(1 mg / kg)或罗库溴铵(0.6 mg / kg)诱导麻醉。用100%氧气开始辅助面罩通气。在通过神经肌肉监测将T1评估为零后,双向施加电击刺激。癫痫发作停止后立即将接受罗库溴铵的患者注射16、8、4 mg / kg舒马葡糖以逆转肌肉松弛。继续进行神经肌肉监测,直到腿部胫神经处的四轮传动比恢复到0.9。比较了两种松弛剂将T1恢复至10%和90%的时间。结果:16 mg / kg sugammadex后T1恢复到90%的时间比接受SCC治疗的患者要短(p = 0.046),而经过4 mg / kg sugammadex接受治疗的时间要比接受SCC的患者更长(p = 0.046)。 SCC组:429±65 s,Sugammadex组16 mg / kg,Sugammadex组:387±63 s,Sugammadex组8 mg / kg,Sugammadex组:462±66 s,4 mg / kg Sugammadex组:563±45 s,#; p <0.05与SCC相比,#p <0.01,而Sugammadex为16 mg / kg)。结论:这项研究证明了罗库溴铵-sugammadex替代SCC在ECT期间肌肉松弛的功效,并表明与ECT期间从1 mg / kg SCC自发恢复相比,8 mg / kg sugammadex可以从罗库溴铵肌肉松弛中恢复同样快。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号