首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anesthesia >Comparison of the intracuff pressures of three different tracheostomy tubes.
【24h】

Comparison of the intracuff pressures of three different tracheostomy tubes.

机译:三种不同气管切开术导管的袖带内压力比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the cuff pressures of three tracheostomy tubes, MERA sofit CLEAR, Blue Line Tracheostomy Tube, and Tracheosoft. Each tracheostomy tube with an internal diameter of 7.0 mm was put into a plastic column. The cuff was then inflated with air to seal the column, and the column was filled with water. The air in the cuff was withdrawn gradually and the cuff pressure at the point of water leakage was measured. Six columns of different size were used. In columns with an internal diameter of 18-21 mm, the water leakage pressure was lower in the following order: MERA sofit CLEAR < Tracheosoft < or = Blue Line Tracheostomy Tube. A mongrel dog was tracheotomized, and each tracheostomy tube with an internal diameter of 7.5 mm was intubated. The cuff air was increased by 1 ml from 4 ml to 10 ml, and the intracuff pressure was then measured. The intracaff pressure of the Blue Line Tracheostomy Tube was the highest at the same cuff volume, and that of the Tracheosoft was next. Based on these results, the MERA sofit CLEAR was found to maintain most safely the lowest intracuff pressure to seal the trachea among the three tracheostomy tubes tested.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较三种气管切开术导管,MERA sofit CLEAR,蓝线气管切开术导管和气管切开术的袖带压力。将每个内径为7.0 mm的气管切开术管放入塑料柱中。然后将袖带充气,以密封色谱柱,并在色谱柱中充满水。逐渐抽出袖带中的空气,并测量漏水点的袖带压力。使用六根不同尺寸的柱。在内径为18-21 mm的色谱柱中,漏水压力按以下顺序降低:MERA sofit CLEAR

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号