...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aerosol Science >Comparison of electrostatic collection and liquid impinging methods when collecting airborne house dust allergens, endotoxin and (1,3)-β-d-glucans
【24h】

Comparison of electrostatic collection and liquid impinging methods when collecting airborne house dust allergens, endotoxin and (1,3)-β-d-glucans

机译:收集空气中的房屋粉尘过敏原,内毒素和(1,3)-β-d-葡聚糖时静电收集和液体撞击方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of electrostatic collection was investigated in quantifying airborne environmental al-lergens and toxins. The experiments were conducted with two 96-well plates filled with water-and placed into the electrostatic sampler designed in this study. The combinations of different electrostatic fields: 0.63, 1.25kV/cm, and different sampling flow rates: 5, 12.5L/min, were tested with the electrostatic sampler. As a reference, a BioSampler operating at 12.5L/min was simultaneously placed in the same environments. The sampling lasted for 40 min both for electrostatic sampler and the BioSampler in each test. House dust allergens, endotoxin and (1,3)-β-D-glucans in the air samples collected were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) method, respectively. The entire experiments were conducted both in office environment and hotel rooms. The concentrations of airborne allergens (Der p 1 and Der f 1) and toxins (endotoxin and (1,3)-β-D-glucans) obtained by the electrostatic sampler were shown significantly higher than those by the BioSampler in most cases. Paired t-tests (n = 9) indicated that the sampling difference was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). For allergens, the concentration ratio was up to 5.6, and for toxins the concentration ratio was up to 10.8 when the electrostatic sampler was operated at 1.25 kV/cm and 5 L/min. In general, the concentration ratio decreased for both allergens and toxins when the electrostatic field strength decreased or when the sampling flow rate increased for the electrostatic sampler. Paired t-tests (n = 9) also indicated there were statistically significant effects of electrostatic field strength and the sampling flow rates on the performance of the electrostatic sampler when collecting the airborne allergens and toxins. This study presented an airborne environmental allergen and toxin monitoring technology, which holds broad promise for detecting and quantifying low level environmental allergen and toxins.
机译:在定量空气传播的环境致敏物和毒素中,研究了静电收集的使用。实验是用两个装满水的96孔板进行的,并将其放入本研究设计的静电采样器中。使用静电采样器测试了不同的静电场:0.63、1.25kV / cm和不同的采样流速:5、12.5L / min的组合。作为参考,以12.5L / min的速度运行的BioSampler同时放置在相同的环境中。每次测试中,静电采样器和BioSampler的采样持续40分钟。分别使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和Li变形细胞溶解(LAL)方法分析收集的空气样品中的屋尘变应原,内毒素和(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖。整个实验都是在办公室环境和酒店房间中进行的。在大多数情况下,通过静电采样器获得的空气中过敏原(Der p 1和Der f 1)和毒素(内毒素和(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖)的浓度均显着高于BioSampler。配对t检验(n = 9)表明,抽样差异具有统计学意义(p值<0.05)。当静电采样器以1.25 kV / cm和5 L / min的速度运行时,对于过敏原而言,浓度比最高为5.6,对于毒素而言,浓度比最高为10.8。通常,当静电场强度降低或静电采样器的采样流速增加时,过敏原和毒素的浓度比都会降低。配对的t检验(n = 9)还表明,在收集空气中的过敏原和毒素时,静电场强度和采样流速对静电采样器的性能具有统计学上的显着影响。这项研究提出了一种机载环境变应原和毒素监测技术,为检测和量化低水平的环境变应原和毒素具有广阔的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号