...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA psychiatry >State Parity laws and access to treatment for substance use disorder in the United States implications for federal Parity legislation
【24h】

State Parity laws and access to treatment for substance use disorder in the United States implications for federal Parity legislation

机译:美国的州平价法和药物滥用障碍的治疗可及性对联邦平价法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE: The passage of the 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the 2010 Affordable Care Act incorporated parity for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment into federal legislation. However, prior research provides us with scant evidence as to whether federal parity legislation will hold the potential for improving access to SUD treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of state-level SUD parity laws on state-aggregate SUD treatment rates and to shed light on the impact of the recent federal SUD parity legislation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study using a 2-way (state and year) fixed-effect method. We included all known specialty SUD treatment facilities in the United States and examined treatment rates from October 1, 2000, through March 31, 2008. Our main sourceof data was the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services, which provides facility-level information on specialty SUD treatment. INTERVENTIONS: State-level SUD parity laws during the study period. MAINOUTCOMES ANDMEASURES: State-aggregate SUD treatment rates in (1) all specialty SUD treatment facilities and (2) specialty SUD treatment facilities accepting private insurance. RESULTS: The implementation of any SUD parity law increased the treatment rate by 9% (P <.001) in all specialty SUD treatment facilities and by 15% (P =.02) in facilities accepting private insurance. Full parity and parity only if SUD coverage is offered increased the SUD treatment rate by 13% (P =.02) and 8% (P =.04), respectively, in all facilities and by 21% (P =.03) and 10% (P =.04), respectively, in facilities accepting private insurance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We found a positive effect of the implementation of state SUD parity legislation on access to specialty SUD treatment. Furthermore, the positive association is more pronounced in states with more comprehensive parity laws. Our findings suggest that federal parity legislation holds the potential to improve access to SUD treatment.
机译:重要信息:2008年《心理健康平等和成瘾平等法》和2010年《平价医疗法案》的通过将对物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的均等纳入了联邦立法。但是,先前的研究为我们提供了很少的证据来证明联邦平价立法是否具有改善SUD治疗的可能性。目的:研究州级SUD平价法律对州总体SUD治疗率的影响,并阐明近期联邦SUD平价立法的影响。设计,地点和参与者:我们使用2方向(状态和年份)固定效果方法进行了准实验研究。我们纳入了美国所有已知的特种SUD治疗设施,并检查了2000年10月1日至2008年3月31日的治疗率。我们的主要数据来源是美国物质滥用治疗服务国家调查,该调查提供了有关特种疾病的设施级信息。 SUD治疗。干预措施:研究期间的州级SUD平价法律。主要结果和措施:(1)所有专用SUD处理设施和(2)接受私人保险的专用SUD处理设施的州总计SUD处理率。结果:任何SUD平价法的实施,在所有专用SUD处理设施中的治疗率均提高了9%(P <.001),在接受私人保险的设施中则提高了15%(P = .02)。仅在提供SUD覆盖的情况下,完全奇偶校验和奇偶校验在所有设施中分别将SUD处理率分别提高了13%(P = .02)和8%(P = .04)和21%(P = .03)和在接受私人保险的机构中分别占10%(P = .04)。结论和相关性:我们发现实施州SUD均等立法对获得特殊SUD治疗具有积极影响。此外,在具有更全面的均等法律的州中,积极联系更为明显。我们的发现表明,联邦平价立法具有改善获得SUD治疗的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号