首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal child psychology >Cool Decision-Making in Adolescents with Behavior Disorder and/or Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability
【24h】

Cool Decision-Making in Adolescents with Behavior Disorder and/or Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability

机译:有行为障碍和/或轻度至边缘性智力障碍的青少年的冷静决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adolescents with Behavior Disorders (BD), Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability (MBID), and with both BD and MBID (BD + MBID) are known to take more risks than normal controls. To examine the processes underlying this increased risk-taking, the present study investigated cool decision-making strategies in 479 adolescents (12-18 years, 55.9 % male) from these four groups. Cool decision-making was assessed with the paper-and-pencil Gambling Machine Task. This task, in combination with advanced latent group analysis, allows for an assessment of decision strategies. Results indicated that adolescents with BD and controls were almost equivalent in their decision-making strategies, whereas adolescents with MBID and adolescents with BD + MBID were characterized by suboptimal decision-making strategies, with only minor differences between these two clinical groups. These findings may have important clinical implications, as they suggest that risk taking in adolescents with MBID and in adolescents with BD + MBID can be (partly) attributed to the strategies that these adolescents use to make their decisions. Interventions may therefore focus on an improvement of these strategies.
机译:已知行为障碍(BD),轻度至边境智障(MBID)以及BD和MBID(BD + MBID)的青少年比正常对照承担更大的风险。为了研究这种增加冒险精神的过程,本研究调查了这四组479名青少年(12-18岁,男性占55.9%)中的冷静决策策略。用纸笔赌博机任务评估了很酷的决策。该任务与高级潜在组分析相结合,可以评估决策策略。结果表明,具有BD的青少年和对照组的决策策略几乎相同,而具有MBID的青少年和具有BD + MBID的青少年的决策策略欠佳,这两个临床组之间只有很小的差异。这些发现可能具有重要的临床意义,因为它们表明,MBID青少年和BD + MBID青少年的冒险行为可以(部分)归因于这些青少年用来做出决定的策略。因此,干预措施可能集中于改进这些策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号