...
首页> 外文期刊>JCT coatingstech >U.S. Supreme Court Echoes ACA Amicus Arguments in CTS Corporation v. Peter Waldburger, et al.
【24h】

U.S. Supreme Court Echoes ACA Amicus Arguments in CTS Corporation v. Peter Waldburger, et al.

机译:美国最高法院在CTS Corporation诉Peter Waldburger等人的案中回应了ACA Amicus的论点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On June 9, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed an appellate court judgment in CIS Corporation v. Peter Waldburger, et a/., issuing a decision that reinforces the foundations of the amicus brief that ACA submitted in support of CTS. The nation's highest court, in a 7-2 opinion delivered by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, concluded that 42 U.S.C. S9558 (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980's Section 309) does not preempt state statutes of repose.
机译:6月9日,美国最高法院在CIS Corporation诉Peter Waldburger等人的案中推翻了上诉法院的判决,该判决加强了ACA为支持CTS提交的法庭之友摘要的基础。美国最高法院在安东尼·肯尼迪(Anthony M.Kennedy)法官以7比2的意见得出的结论中认为,美国S9558(《 1980年综合环境响应,补偿和赔偿责任法》第309节)并未取代休养状态法令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号