...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the esophagus: official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus >Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms using the stag beetle knife
【24h】

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms using the stag beetle knife

机译:锹形甲刀对内镜治疗食管浅部肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an accepted standard treatment for early gastric cancer but is not widely used in the esophagus because of technical difficulties. To increase the safety of esophageal ESD, we used a scissors-type device called the stag beetle (SB) knife. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ESD using the SB knife. We performed a single-center retrospective, uncontrolled trial. A total of 38 lesions were excised by ESD from 35 consecutive patients who were retrospectively divided into the following two groups according to the type of knife used to perform ESD: the hook knife (hook group) was used in 20 patients (21 lesions), and the SB knife (SB group) was used in 15 patients (17 lesions). We evaluated and compared the operative time, lesion size, en bloc resection rate, pathological margins free rate, and complication rate in both groups. The operative time was shorter in the SB group (median 70.0 minutes [interquartile range, 47.5-87.0]) than in the hook group (92.0 minutes [interquartile range, 63.0-114.0]) (P = 0.019), and the rate of complications in the SB group was 0% compared with 45.0% in the hook group (P = 0.004). However, the lesion size, en bloc resection rate, and pathological margins free rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. In conclusion, ESD using the SB knife was safer than that using a conventional knife for superficial esophageal neoplasms.
机译:内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是早期胃癌的公认标准治疗方法,但由于技术上的困难,并未广泛用于食道。为了提高食道ESD的安全性,我们使用了一种剪刀式装置,称为锹形甲虫(SB)刀。这项研究的目的是使用SB刀确定ESD的功效和安全性。我们进行了单中心回顾性非对照试验。根据ESD手术刀的类型,从35例连续的患者中通过ESD切除了38个病变,根据其使用的刀的类型,将其回顾性分为以下两组:钩刀(钩组)用于20例患者(21个病变), 15例患者(17处病灶)使用SB刀(SB组)。我们评估并比较了两组的手术时间,病变大小,整体切除率,病理切缘游离率和并发症发生率。 SB组的手术时间(中位数为70.0分钟[四分位间距,47.5-87.0])比钩组的手术时间(92.0分钟[四分位间距,63.0-114.0])短(P = 0.019),且并发症发生率更高SB组为0%,而钩组为45.0%(P = 0.004)。但是,两组的病变大小,整体切除率和病理学无缘率没有显着差异。总之,对于浅表食管肿瘤,使用SB刀的ESD比使用常规刀的ESD更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号