...
首页> 外文期刊>Disaster management & response: DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association >Better prepared but spread too thin: the impact of emergency preparedness funding on local public health.
【24h】

Better prepared but spread too thin: the impact of emergency preparedness funding on local public health.

机译:准备得更好,但传播得太少:应急准备资金对当地公共卫生的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Local public health authorities (LPHAs) are recognized as playing critical roles in response to biological, chemical, and other health emergencies. An influx of emergency preparedness funding has created new and expanding responsibilities for LPHAs. Concern that funding for emergency response is diverting attention and resources away from other core public health responsibilities is increasing. In order to determine the impact of emergency preparedness funding on public health infrastructure, qualitative interviews with 27 LPHAs in the metro-Boston area were conducted as part of an on-going evaluation of preparedness planning in Massachusetts. Feedback on the benefits and challenges of recent emergency preparedness planning mandates was obtained. Benefits include opportunities to develop relationships within and across public health departments and increases in communication between local and state authorities. Challenges include budget constraints, staffing shortages, and competing public responsibilities. Policy recommendations for improving planning for emergency response at the local level are provided.
机译:地方公共卫生当局(LPHA)被认为在应对生物,化学和其他健康紧急情况方面发挥着关键作用。大量的应急准备资金为LPHA创造了新的和不断扩展的职责。人们对用于应急响应的资金转移了关注,并且资源从其他核心公共卫生职责转移开来的担忧正在增加。为了确定应急准备资金对公共卫生基础设施的影响,作为对马萨诸塞州进行的准备计划进行持续评估的一部分,对波士顿地区的27个LPHA进行了定性采访。获得了有关近期应急准备计划任务的好处和挑战的反馈。好处包括在公共卫生部门内部和之间建立关系的机会,以及增加地方和州政府之间的沟通的机会。挑战包括预算限制,人员短缺和竞争的公共责任。提供了用于改善地方应急计划的政策建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号