...
首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >Content comparison of self-reported disability measures for the elderly according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health
【24h】

Content comparison of self-reported disability measures for the elderly according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health

机译:根据功能,残疾和健康国际分类对老年人自我报告的残疾措施的内容比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To identify self-reported disability measures developed for older adults by performing a systematic literature review and to compare the contents of all identified measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Method: A broad systematic literature search was performed in March 2012 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PROQOLID. Each item in the identified measures was extracted and linked to the ICF categories. A content comparison between measures was performed. The content density and diversity of each measure were assessed by calculating the content density ratio (the number of meaningful concepts divided by the number of items in each questionnaire) and content diversity ratio (the number of different ICF categories divided by the number of linked meaningful concepts), respectively. Results: We reviewed 5622 published articles and identified 13 eligible measures. In total, 293 meaningful concepts from 265 items were extracted, of which, 270 concepts were linked to the ICF. A total of 62 different ICF categories were addressed. EARRS, FHS and SF-LLFDI had the highest content density ratio, while FHS and KI had the highest content diversity ratio. Different measures differed considerably in content. Conclusions: The ICF can be used as a conceptual framework not only for assessing measures but also for developing new measures. According to this ICF-based content comparison, the contents of currently available measures for disability in older adults vary significantly from one another. Our study may provide useful information for the selection of suitable measures for a particular purpose, as well as the development of new measures.Implications for RehabilitationThe ICF provides an excellent framework when comparing the contents of self-reported disability measures for the elderly.Thirteen self-reported disability measures developed for the elderly are identified and their content is compared directly according to the ICF.The content of currently available measures is considerably varied. This review may help readers select proper measures for specific purposes.
机译:目的:通过进行系统的文献综述,确定针对老年人制定的自我报告的残疾措施,并根据《国际功能,残疾与健康分类》(ICF)比较所有确定的措施的内容。方法:2012年3月,在以下数据库中进行了广泛的系统文献检索:MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,PsycINFO和PROQOLID。确定的度量中的每个项目均被提取并链接到ICF类别。进行了措施之间的内容比较。通过计算内容密度比(有意义的概念数除以每个问卷中的项目数)和内容多样性比(不同的ICF类别数除以链接的有意义数,可以评估每种度量的内容密度和多样性)概念)。结果:我们审查了5622篇发表的文章,确定了13项合格措施。总共从265个项目中提取了293个有意义的概念,其中270个概念与ICF相关联。总共解决了62个不同的ICF类别。 EARRS,FHS和SF-LLFDI的含量密度比最高,而FHS和KI的含量多样性比最高。不同措施的内容差异很大。结论:ICF不仅可以用作评估措施的概念框架,还可以用作制定新措施的概念框架。根据这种基于ICF的内容比较,目前针对老年人的残疾措施的内容彼此之间存在很大差异。我们的研究可能会为选择适合特定目的的措施以及制定新措施提供有用的信息。康复的意义ICF为比较老年人自我报告的残疾措施的内容提供了一个极好的框架。根据ICF确定了针对老年人制定的报告的残疾措施,并直接比较了其内容。目前可用措施的内容差异很大。该评论可以帮助读者针对特定目的选择适当的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号