首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: A literature review
【24h】

Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: A literature review

机译:社区康复(CBR)监测和评估方法和工具:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To identify and analyse tools and methods that have been reported in the literature for the monitoring and evaluation of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) programmes. Method: A literature review and descriptive analysis were carried out to scope CBR monitoring and evaluation methods and tools. A search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, hand searches and reference lists. Reports were retrieved, screened and information was extracted and analysed against research questions. Results: There were 34 reports which met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the 34 reports showed that most reports used demographic and programme data. A range of methods were used: interviews, focus groups and questionnaires being the most common. Apart from this, no common standardised procedures or tools were identified and there was not a standard approach to the inclusion of people with disabilities or other CBR stakeholders. Conclusions: The findings suggest that there would be value in creating resources such as guidelines, common processes and checklists for monitoring and evaluation of CBR, to facilitate efficient and comparable practices and more comparable data. This needs to be done in partnership with people with disabilities, CBR providers, partners and researchers to ensure that all stakeholders' needs are understood and met.Implications for RehabilitationWhile there is broad scope and complexity of CBR programmes, there needs to be consistency and a valid approach in the monitoring and evaluation methods and tools used by CBR programmes.The principles of CBR and CRPD require that monitoring and evaluation involve people with disabilities, CBR managers and staff not only as informants but also in the design and execution of monitoring and evaluation activities.The consistent use of appropriate and valid monitoring and evaluation methods and tools will contribute to developing a stronger evidence base on the efficacy and effectiveness of CBR.
机译:目的:确定和分析文献中报告的工具和方法,以监测和评估社区康复计划。方法:对CBR监测评估方法和工具进行文献回顾和描述性分析。使用PubMed和Google Scholar数据库,人工搜索和参考列表进行搜索。检索,筛选报告,提取信息并针对研究问题进行分析。结果:有34份符合纳入标准的报告。对34份报告的分析表明,大多数报告使用人口统计数据和计划数据。使用了多种方法:最常见的是访谈,焦点小组和问卷调查。除此之外,没有确定通用的标准化程序或工具,也没有采用标准方法来纳入残疾人或其他社区康复利益相关者。结论:研究结果表明,为指导和评估社区康复,创建诸如指南,通用流程和清单等资源,以促进有效和可比的实践以及更可比的数据,将具有价值。这项工作需要与残疾人,社区康复服务提供者,合作伙伴和研究人员合作完成,以确保了解并满足所有利益相关者的需求。康复的意义尽管社区康复项目的范围广泛且复杂,但需要保持一致性和CBR和CRPD的原则要求监测和评估不仅要让残疾人士,CBR管理人员和工作人员作为信息提供人参与,而且还要在监测和评估的设计和执行过程中采取有效的方法。持续使用适当和有效的监控和评估方法与工具将有助于基于社区康复的有效性和有效性得出更强有力的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号