...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic molecular pathology : >Detection of allelic status of 1p and 19q by microsatellite-based PCR versus FISH: limitations and advantages in application to patient management.
【24h】

Detection of allelic status of 1p and 19q by microsatellite-based PCR versus FISH: limitations and advantages in application to patient management.

机译:通过微卫星PCR和FISH检测1p和19q等位基因状态:在患者管理中的局限性和优势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Combined loss of chromosome arms 1p and 19q in oligodendroglial tumors has become a powerful predictor of prognosis and treatment response, and hence clinical testing for their detection is widely used nowadays. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) are the 2 important relatively common clinical molecular diagnostic techniques used for this purpose and they have their unique advantages and limitations. The preference of methodology used depends on local expertise and existing laboratory capabilities. However, there is no consensus on which methodologic approach has a better potential. The objective of the study was to compare the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility of FISH and PCR in detecting the 1p and 19q LOH status. Using the PCR-based method, a LOH analysis was performed on 30 oligodendrogliomas and 10 glioblastomas using fresh-frozen tissue and peripheral blood as control. A FISH assay using paraffin blocks was performed on all the cases. Concordance for 1p and 19q was found in 92.5% (37 of 40) and 82.5% (33 of 40) cases, respectively. The relative advantages and limitations of both the techniques are analyzed and discussed. The main issue pertains to the use of the best technique in large clinical trials whose results are translated to patient care services. Unless the technique used is correct, the results of clinical trials and their correlations may be somewhat questionable.
机译:少突胶质细胞瘤中染色体臂1p和19q的联合丧失已成为预后和治疗反应的有力预测指标,因此,如今对其进行检测的临床测试已得到广泛应用。基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的杂合性缺失(LOH)分析和荧光原位杂交(FISH)是用于此目的的两种重要的相对常见的临床分子诊断技术,它们具有其独特的优势和局限性。使用哪种方法学取决于当地的专业知识和现有的实验室能力。但是,关于哪种方法学方法具有更好的潜力尚未达成共识。该研究的目的是比较FISH和PCR在检测1p和19q LOH状态中的准确性,可靠性和可行性。使用基于PCR的方法,以新鲜冷冻组织和外周血为对照,对30例少突胶质细胞瘤和10例胶质母细胞瘤进行LOH分析。在所有情况下均使用石蜡块进行了FISH分析。 1p和19q的一致性分别在92.5%(40个中的37个)和82.5%(40个中的33个)中发现。分析和讨论了这两种技术的相对优势和局限性。主要问题涉及在大型临床试验中使用最佳技术,其结果可转化为患者护理服务。除非使用的技术正确,否则临床试验的结果及其相关性可能会有些疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号