首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >A meta-analysis of comparing fine-needle aspiration and frozen section for evaluating thyroid nodules.
【24h】

A meta-analysis of comparing fine-needle aspiration and frozen section for evaluating thyroid nodules.

机译:对比分析细针穿刺法和冷冻切片法评估甲状腺结节的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The literature on comparing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and frozen section for evaluating thyroid nodules was reviewed. Publications on this subject were divided into three groups (follicular lesions, non-follicular lesions and thyroid lesions, not otherwise specified). A meta-analysis was done to compare sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values between FNA and frozen section diagnoses. For follicular lesions, FNA was much more sensitive but less specific, with lower positive predictive value than frozen section. FNA and frozen section are virtually identical in all parameters of accuracy in evaluating thyroid nodules that are not follicular lesions. The third group of publications that did not separate/specify follicular lesions from non-follicular lesions was non-contributory.
机译:综述了比较细针穿刺术(FNA)和冷冻切片评估甲状腺结节的文献。关于该主题的出版物分为三组(卵泡病变,非卵泡病变和甲状腺病变,未另作说明)。进行荟萃分析,以比较FNA和冰冻切片诊断之间的敏感性,特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。对于滤泡性病变,FNA比冰冻切片敏感得多,但特异性较低,阳性预测值较低。 FNA和冰冻切片在评估非滤泡性病变的甲状腺结节的准确性的所有参数上几乎相同。没有将卵泡性病变与非卵泡性病变区分开/未指明的第三组出版物是无贡献的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号