首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >The Enigmas of TFP in China: A meta-analysis
【24h】

The Enigmas of TFP in China: A meta-analysis

机译:中国全要素生产率之谜:荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a meta-analysis of 5308 observations of total factor productivity growth (TFPG) in China from 150 primary studies to provide some insightful explanations to the controversies about productivity growth in China in the current literature. The main findings include that (1) the mean TFPG of the aggregate economy at the national level in the current literature is only about 2% after 1978, which barely contributes to 20% economic growth; (2) there are three cycles for TFPG after 1978 and each circle lasts about 10 years; (3) sector-specific TFPGs are generally larger than aggregate economic TFPGs; (4) regional disparities of TFPG are significant and specifically the TFPG in East China is higher than that in Central and West China; (5) TFPG after 1978 is in general greater than that before 1978; and (6) peer-review process and paper languages are significantly correlated with TFPG results.
机译:本文对来自150项主要研究的5308份中国全要素生产率增长(TFPG)观测值进行了荟萃分析,以为当前文献中有关中国生产率增长争议的观点提供一些有见地的解释。主要发现包括:(1)1978年以后,现有文献对全国总体经济的平均TFPG仅为2%左右,几乎没有对20%的经济增长做出贡献; (2)1978年以后,TFPG分为三个周期,每个周期大约持续10年; (3)特定行业的TFPG通常大于总体经济TFPG; (4)TFPG的地区差异很大,特别是华东地区的TFPG高于中西部地区。 (5)1978年以后的TFPG总体上比1978年之前大; (6)同行评审过程和论文语言与TFPG结果显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号