...
首页> 外文期刊>Desalination: The International Journal on the Science and Technology of Desalting and Water Purification >A comparative study of tertiary wastewater treatment by physico-chemical-UV process and macrofiltration-ultrafiltration technologies
【24h】

A comparative study of tertiary wastewater treatment by physico-chemical-UV process and macrofiltration-ultrafiltration technologies

机译:物化-紫外线法与大滤-超滤技术处理三次废水的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparative study was undertaken of the economic costs and quality of effluents obtained from physicochemical-UV and macrofiltration-ultrafilrration as municipal wastewater tertiary treatments.A physico-chemical-UV urban wastewater treatment system was designed for the study.Pre-treatment to UV radiation disinfection consisted of coagulation with alumina (100 mg/L),sedimentation by sludge-blanket sedimentation tank (0.8 m3/m2 h) and filtration by sand-pressure filter (5.0 m3/m2 h).The ultrafiltration module was equipped with flat polyvinylidenefluoride membranes (0.05 urn pore size),with pre-treatment carried out by a sand-pressure filter (8.0 m3/m2 h).Both systems obtained effluent of excellent physico-chemical quality (91% removal of suspended solids and 99% turbidity removal) and microbiological quality (total absence of nematode eggs,coliforms,E.coli and coliphages).However,while physico-chemical quality remained constant in both systems,microbiological quality of effluent from the UV-disinfection process was shown to depend on the quality of influent,particularly with regard to transmittance.By contrast,microbiological quality remained constant in the case of membrane technology.Other control parameters such as particulate analysis confirmed the higher quality of ultrafiltration effluent in comparison with the physico-chemical-UV process.With regard to costs,both technologies present similar variable costs,while fixed costs of the membrane installation are double those of the physico-chemical-UV process,owing particularly to the high cost of the installation itself.
机译:对作为城市污水三次处理的物化-紫外线和大滤-超滤获得的废水的经济成本和质量进行了比较研究,设计了一个物化-紫外线城市污水处理系统进行研究。消毒包括氧化铝凝结(100 mg / L),污泥毯沉淀池沉淀(0.8 m3 / m2 h)和砂压过滤器(5.0 m3 / m2 h)过滤。超滤模块配有扁平聚偏二氟乙烯膜(孔径为0.05 n),通过砂压过滤器(8.0 m3 / m2·h)进行预处理。两个系统的出水均具有出色的物理化学质量(去除了91%的悬浮固体和去除了99%的浊度) )和微生物质量(完全不存在线虫卵,大肠菌,大肠杆菌和噬菌体)。但是,虽然两个系统的理化质量均保持不变,但废水的微生物质量结果表明,紫外线消毒过程取决于进水的质量,特别是透过率。与此相反,采用膜技术的微生物质量保持恒定。其他控制参数(例如颗粒分析)证实了超滤废水的质量较高。就成本而言,这两种技术的可变成本相近,而膜装置的固定成本是物理-化学-UV工艺的两倍,特别是由于安装成本高本身。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号